Originally posted by Davo:
You can call them that, if you believe that's what guides their decisions.


Cool, thanks for allowing me to make a judgement about a judge's ideology based on his record again. I was starting to wonder how else to do it.

Originally posted by Davo:
But be careful about incorrectly inferring causality. If Ginsburg could actually read the Constitution and interpret it as if she could, would she be a hardline conservative?


Since many of Ginsberg's decisions have been leftist, she must not agree with you that conservative decisions = correct decisions.

Originally posted by Viss1:
In other words, in Davoland, judges who interpret the Constitution "correctly" are hardline conservatives, but I'm "dumb" for saying hardline conservatives match your interpretation of said Constitution.


Originally posted by Davo:
I'm saying that the vast majority of people who interpret the Consitution correctly also happen to be what you may consider 'hardline conservatives'.


Thanks for supporting everything I just said.

Originally posted by Davo:
(oh, that's right, you're not a leftie, so that would be our side ).


Newsflash - the political spectrum isn't comprised of only 2 individual and opposing groups. Can't believe you still refuse to understand that.

E0 #36 '95 Ranger '82 Honda CX500