Funny thing about this is I never claimed to beat a C5 vette and you did.
For the bench racers...
C5 vette
4.4-4.5
12.5-12.6 @ 113mph
I don't think so Tim... Not now, not on the internet, and not in real life. Well I suppose if the driver sucks and ran mid 13's or slower but then that's like saying you beat a Top Fuel car; that broke at the line.
All this beaten by a never going to get traction from a stop Datsun.
A light weight Datsun is about as traction limited as our FWD platform is. (btw I've driven several and built a 79 Fairlady {82 turbo engine & 5-speed} and before you cry BS I'll save you the embarassment because I lived in Japan for ~3 years
) I also rebuilt a 75 260Z for a friend. (nice car I like Datsuns/Nissans)
As for your car. It's too bad I can't run at one of those metric Canadian tracks. Shocking times always seem to come from there and the great cold dense air. (That's an old joke btw
- don't cry eh)
So I guess this all boils down to you trying to divert attention and flame me for something you claimed and I never did. Just how does that work anyway???
Can I see you beat a 12.5 @ 113 C5 please... The only time I ran against one I treed his ass, he spun through the first couple gears, and I still lost by a few tenths... Heck there's a good story about it in a post from last fall. They kill both of our cars in the power to weight department.
