Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
#1336836 07/20/05 07:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,516
S
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
S
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,516
It looks like the tracks equipment is messed up...
Not only are the times low, but neither of you reached 60 mph in the 9 sec run


Cameron 98 Black CSVT #2958
#1336837 07/20/05 07:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
something is wrong there. 9.5 @ ~59mph??? WTF, over?


Ryan Trollin!
#1336838 07/20/05 07:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Originally posted by Obie1:
Originally posted by DemonSVT:

9.1, 9.3, 9.5 in the 1/8th is BS enough but 9.1 & 9.3 to 1000' BWAHAHAHAHA...






Forgive my crappy picture taking but I've been up over 24hours

Digital Slacker thanks but I figured out how to do some basics on imageshack last night at work.

Demon I have alot of respect for you and have never met you, how about never calling me a liar again, not everyone on the internet is going to tell lies in hopes of impressing you or the other "old heads" on this site, if thats what you think. I know that we have had alot of BS & such going on on the site recently but I have no reason to lie about what I did( I lost to my baby brother ). Maybe this track( Camp Hill AL) is a little short, Maybe their equipment is off or just plain sucks. I don't know anything for sure, but what this slip says is that I had a 9.3 ET In an 1/8th. Thats why I said it and the only reason why.

O.B.



Your track is bullsh~t.

9.1 at 58-59mph

Absolute bullsh~t

To run 9.1 you are looking at 80+mph easily.

59mph is more like 11-12 seconds.

Then to top is off a 2.5x 60' time. You must be making a good 300 at the wheels with torque to match to go from a 2.5 to a 9.1 That track is completely FUBAR'd.

The wife's cavalier does the 1/8th mile in 9.92 @ 70.7mph and 0-60mph is it's quickest acceleration point. (only 15.7 @ 88) Unlike our car that is faster on the top half of the track comparatively.

So you may be telling the truth about the timeslips but the timeslip are pure garbage. Those times are just not possible. PERIOD.

I would not take a slip from that track as a legitimate time. Hell I bet my car would run 7's there easily.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#1336839 07/20/05 07:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
Greg do you need a cup of coffee?


Ryan Trollin!
#1336840 07/20/05 08:04 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 718
9
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
9
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 718
seriously are you having without joe rogan?(sp?)

lol.


1999 Cougar V6 MTX SVT UIM/LIM/65mm TB, I/H/E, Fidanza/SPEC III/Torsen, Koni/GC's, 19" Icon wheels w/ Pirelli rubber, NX Wet Kit
#1336841 07/20/05 10:15 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 82
S
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
S
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 82
Has anyone taken in to account that KS is 745 feet above sea level and the times should be higher. we do not run those times at sea level here in florida.

#1336842 07/20/05 10:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
A
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
A
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
There's no SVT in any Eminem stuff. There is a Contour:

http://www.contour.org/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=interests&Number=226552

"Tired of [censored] the same blonde whore after work in the back of a Contour "

It's not from 8 mile; it's from "If I Had..."

But close, good try.


-Philip Maynard '95 Contour [71 STS | Track Whore] '97 Miata [71 ES | Boulevard Pimp] 2006 autocross results
#1336843 07/23/05 06:21 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
R
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
R
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
heres my slip from last night in Ohio at Norwalk Raceway. I gained 3 tenths and 2 mph from my SCT 2 tuned by Wayne. I leaned out the tune only .2 with out a wide band I didnt want to go too lean but Wayne says it should be about 12.5/1 so I leaned it out to 12.7/1. Here is my slip this is on nitto neo gen tires no lsd. Demon I dont know why you keep bringing up that I previously said 14's with a 2.5 60 when Ive already said it was a typo. I launch my car at 5000 rpm and bang the shat out of the gears on a good track. Demon if you dont believe that people can do this with these mods maybe its time to go back to school.
Go to my cardomain site for mods.


99 SVT "nice" 14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim) FOR SALE contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122
#1336844 07/26/05 03:15 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,353
P
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
P
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,353
What I want to know is who you were racing against... 10.6xx at 122mph !


1999 Blk/Tan CSVT #654 - SOLD 2003 Suzuki SV650s
#1336845 07/27/05 09:59 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 759
C
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 759
I have never taken my SVT to our Denton, Tx track, although I am curious to see how bad my time would be.

However, I took my 1997 Integra GS-R our there. These were the models second to the Integra Type-R (GS-R 170hp Type R 195..or was it 190?)

Anyways, my BEST time was 10.6...dont remember at what MPH, but if a 4 banger can do 10.6 I dont see why Tours couldnt do 9.6+.....and my very first launch was a joke...lol wheel hop, redlighted, then I crossed at 42 mph since no point in racing.


E0 #4384 of 6535 Born Jan. 9 1998 My SVT from the ashes 147,466 miles, purchased Nov. 2002 @ 76,559 miles
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  mbb41_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5