Originally posted by warmonger:
As far as the T-stat topic: I'm going to bow out of this one now. I only see some smidgeons of truth in all of these perspectives and I don't feel they change the whole truth or overall perspective on the matter.
I'm going to point out that if it were that easy for the manufacturer to improve their fuel economy and improve their overall CAFE (corporate average) then this would be standard equipment to every car. It obviously has more drawbacks than even I have indicated in that case. Hell, a tstat is cheap and costs the same irregardless of temperature rating! Why wouldn't they just run a 160 then?




Because just like everything else that comes from the factory, it has drawbacks. The main one being emissions. Lower temp stats effect unburned gasses GREATLY. Without cats or inspection here in Iowa, I don't have to worry about them much.


Originally posted by warmonger:
...
The T-stat temp being the only factor just doesn't make sense; this is additional reinforcement to me besides everything I posted above.
So to each his own.



I also agree with this point, with one exception, when the emissions control parts are deleted. Serious increases in performance and fuel economy can be had on certain models. With the tight engine bays of a Contour, I'd be willing to bet on something big enough to be noticed in mileage logs if you take the time to tune the part throttle cruising areas.


http://www.bnmotorsports.com "And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my CEG brothers. And you will know I am the Moderator when I lay my vengeance upon you."