Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1324498 07/02/05 03:24 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 110
M
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
M
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 110
I picked up the updated 1-2 shift fork (YS4Z-7230-BA) but when I compare it to the current 1-2 fork it looks exactly the same...is that normal or should I take it back for a refund?

FYI I have a revised 01 cougar mtx75.

also will the outter oil seals be ok with 17K or should I change them while I have easy access?


Black E0 SVT
#1324499 07/02/05 04:20 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 238
S
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
S
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 238
Take it back, it was my understanding that the revised shift forks started comming in the 2000 year. I'm sure others will correct me if I am wrong.

mj


Mike C T-Red 99 csvt #490 No longer a dailer driver
#1324500 07/02/05 04:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,975
G
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
G
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,975
I agree.

IIRC 2000 was the latest revision.


Capitol CEG Classifieds Make an offer! 2005 GTO IBM - 337hp/336tq
#1324501 07/02/05 05:38 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
The MTX-75 in the CDW-27 NEVER got the updated 1-2 fork.

Only the Focus did. (02+)

The difference is plain as day to see. The revised 1-2 fork has a roller bearing instead of babbit material.

Part number is XS8Z-7230-DD ~ Taken directly off my website but also has been posted ad nauseam on this board including the sticky thread at the top of this forum with "Part #'s Upgraded MTX 75 Transmission shift forks" in the title.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#1324502 07/02/05 01:06 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 110
M
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
M
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 110
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
The MTX-75 in the CDW-27 NEVER got the updated 1-2 fork.

Only the Focus did. (02+)

The difference is plain as day to see. The revised 1-2 fork has a roller bearing instead of babbit material.

Part number is XS8Z-7230-DD ~ Taken directly off my website but also has been posted ad nauseam on this board including the sticky thread at the top of this forum with "Part #'s Upgraded MTX 75 Transmission shift forks" in the title.




Ok I'll exchange it then. I was looking at the MTX75Components spreadsheet, it says it was last updated May 26 2005. Under shift forks it has YS2Z-7230-BA for 1-2 with 'ball bearing' next to it.


Black E0 SVT
#1324503 07/02/05 03:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
W
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Part numbers could have changed or it could be a mistake.

I posted those part numbers for the roller shift fork back in 2003 so who knows. Ford changes part numbers like underwear.


Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760 356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas! See My Mods '05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red '06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
#1324504 07/03/05 05:58 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
According to Signature's look up XS8Z-7230-DD is the 5-R shifter fork??? (yikes)

Does the YS2Z-7230-BA fork you have have a roller bearing fulcrum???
Does it match the pictures posted?


My old invoice lists the XS8Z-7230-DD fork as the 1-2 fork???


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#1324505 07/03/05 03:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
W
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
I honestly can't remember now. I recorded them in the sticky post and checked them twice before posting. However, I didn't save them after that. Whatever part numbers were on the bags I got were what I posted.


Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760 356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas! See My Mods '05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red '06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black

Moderated by  RoadRunner_dup1, unisys12 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5