|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
If you want to cheat and take the below IMRC TQ around 170ish if they remember to boost the low end timing.
Originally posted by Ray:
(except taking the <IMRC tq.. that sounds like cheating to me..  )
So you agree with me it's a pointless reading because it's not in a usable performance powerband or you disagree with me because you missed my statement. 
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Challenge - power producing, cost effective mods
|
Ford_Guy
|
07/02/05 01:23 AM
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mods
|
DemonSVT_dup1
|
07/02/05 05:28 AM
|
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mo
|
Ray_dup1
|
07/02/05 05:49 AM
|
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mods
|
DemonSVT_dup1
|
07/02/05 05:27 PM
|
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mo
|
Ray_dup1
|
07/02/05 08:24 PM
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mo
|
DemonSVT_dup1
|
07/03/05 05:43 AM
|
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mo
|
DopePope
|
07/03/05 06:23 AM
|
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mo
|
Ray_dup1
|
07/03/05 09:21 AM
|
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mo
|
MazTour
|
07/03/05 01:06 PM
|
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mods
|
warmonger_dup1
|
07/03/05 03:55 PM
|
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mo
|
Barge
|
07/03/05 05:58 PM
|
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mo
|
warmonger_dup1
|
07/04/05 02:15 AM
|
|
Re: Challenge - power producing, cost effective mo
|
Barge
|
07/04/05 07:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|