Originally posted by Davo:
According to you, every opinion is subject to logical and factual analysis before it is considered sensical.


Yes, I subject your opinions to logical analysis. Am I NOT entitled to do so? Are you saying I should NOT expect them to be based on actual fact?

Originally posted by Davo:
Even if an opinion counter to yours survived your logical and factual analysis, you'd still invent some way to try and make the holder look like an idiot.


It's your job to make sense. It's my job to point out when you don't. No one is calling anyone an idiot here, so don't blame me if you feel that way. All I am doing is applying well-established rules of clear thinking that date back to the birth of western civilization. Logic has been the gold standard of thought since, well, ancient Greece.

C'mon, man it's 2005. If you want to feel good about your political opinions, your thinking must at least meet the minimal logical standards that we've had for over two thousand years.

Originally posted by Davo:
Given the facts of the Frist situation, you and Viss1 like to think there is some grand right wing conspiracy to try and make the public forget what Frist said about Schiavo.


Oh, god, Davo. Not another imaginary conspiracy.

Take my advice: just stick with known facts and logical probablilities. It's easier on the brain, and far less likely to lead to silliness like your statement above.