Contour Enthusiasts Group Archives Forums General Common Interests Pentagon video, 56k grab a beer

Originally posted by Jeb Hoge:

---

Originally posted by RT and his SE:

---

Originally posted by Jeb Hoge:

---

And 395 doesn't run that close to the Pentagon, either...I bet they're separated by a solid quarter-mile.

---

At 500 MPH it would take less than 5 seconds to cover that and you'd have to be pretty low at that point to have any hope of making impact.
I still think there are legitimate question.

---

OK, this isn't going to come out nicely.

Do you live here? No. Are you familiar with the topography of Arlington County, particularly with the route that the plane took to get to the Pentagon? I rather doubt it. Let me explain something to you, then. There is NO way that the airplane, at that size and speed, was anything but diving when it impacted the building. To put it simply, if you're headed northbound toward the Pentagon, you are going downhill, whether you're on foot or on a bike or in a car or in an airliner full of terrified passengers. That the pilot managed to hit the wall just at or above ground level and didn't skip the plane off the ground or hit short or long is damned luck and nothing more.

---

Originally posted by RT and his SE:

---

Did you watch the video? No? Because I think if you had you would see that whatever it was that hit the Pentagon it was not diving. (Clarification: There is a difference between diving and descending.)
So your argument actually supports the thinking that it wasn't an airliner.
My point was that with something that big and impact less than 5 seconds away they would need to be lined up and on target.
I have a hard time believing in that much luck!

---

Originally posted by Jeb Hoge:

---

I have a hard time believing in that much conspiracy BS. I'm sorry, you're wrong, and that's all there is to it.

---

Wow! What a compelling argument! Maybe you should keep your .02 cent...look like your going to need it.

Originally posted by Kremithefrog:

---

Originally posted by Antonio Wright:

---

Now, I believe you are missing the point. From what I read, many believe, that two planes did indeed hit the WTC towers. What is in specatulation is whether they were the flights that were hijacked that day. These "theorist" believe that they were special CIA planes fitted with special ordance that would produce such devestation.

---

I believe you're missing the point. These "theorist" are insane.

---

The sad thing is, that I don't believe you will ever get a point, let alone a clue. Now, go troll somewhere else.

99blacksesport, I wonder how many people thought Christopher Columbus "needed to be put in a straight jacket" or was "stupid" for making such outlandish claims.

All I am saying is, don't be so quick to judge.

Originally posted by Jeb Hoge:

---

Yeah, well, I'm tired of hearing the same old rehash played out over and over as if someone's come up with some brilliant new insight. I lived upwind from the Pentagon and smelled it burning. You better damn well believe that those of us who were materially affected by that day care enough about the truth to not appreciate silly conspiracy nonsense from the tinfoil set.

---

Originally posted by t-red2000se:

---

Well, Antonio, what exactly do you believe, and why? Do you buy the theories of a CIA plane hitting the WTC, or do you think it was the terrorist planes hitting? Why do you come to that conclusion?

---