|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184 |
heres one of my slips. took pic w/ my phone.
[IMG]http://us.f605.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter/file.bin[/IMG]
hope this works
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184 |
OK guys here is my Car Domain site I just set up. The pics were taken w/ my Razor cell so there not great but for all you non believers click the link. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122what do ya think?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 453
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 453 |
Originally posted by elraido:
Originally posted by Stylin55_oh:
Yeah i have no idea how he says he's running a 15.08 .. I've got a basically stock (hp wise) SVT and i'll be happy if its under 16 at all. Granted shes got 130,000mi. But still, a full second is a HUGE difference.
Don't stock 95 SE's hit 15.9 or seomthing like that? 
No! They pull a 15.5 with a 2.5 60' Remember? 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184 |
Originally posted by 98ford2L:
Originally posted by elraido:
Originally posted by Stylin55_oh:
Yeah i have no idea how he says he's running a 15.08 .. I've got a basically stock (hp wise) SVT and i'll be happy if its under 16 at all. Granted shes got 130,000mi. But still, a full second is a HUGE difference.
Don't stock 95 SE's hit 15.9 or seomthing like that?
No! They pull a 15.5 with a 2.5 60' Remember?
I already said it was a typo on my part. 2.25 not 2.5
"JEALOUSY IS A WASTED EMOTION"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651 |
IF that is your time slip then well done. That time slip is accurate to me. And if you ran it with your svt, then good job man.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
Can I ask what you did to optimize your TPS, as it states on your cardomain site?
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 453
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 453 |
Originally posted by racerbox77:
Originally posted by 98ford2L:
Originally posted by elraido:
Originally posted by Stylin55_oh:
Yeah i have no idea how he says he's running a 15.08 .. I've got a basically stock (hp wise) SVT and i'll be happy if its under 16 at all. Granted shes got 130,000mi. But still, a full second is a HUGE difference.
Don't stock 95 SE's hit 15.9 or seomthing like that?
No! They pull a 15.5 with a 2.5 60' Remember?
I already said it was a typo on my part. 2.25 not 2.5
"JEALOUSY IS A WASTED EMOTION"
I wasn't actully insulting you, I was reffering to a kid who was one here a few weeks ago talking about how his 95se could pull a 15.5 with a 2.5 60'
So anyway back to you, nice times. And if people are jumping on you it's probably because they have experience, and comments like this don't help, even if you are a really good driver it just doesn't go over real well
Originally posted by racerbox77:
I guess im in that .9% of great drivers
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184 |
hey i only made that comment because nobody believed me about the times. But i see your point it was a smart azz comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184 |
Y2KSVT i spose your being a condesending with your question about the tps but ill entertain it.
optimized TPS meaning stock it read .92 volts. i changed it to .98 just like i do to all the mustangs ive owned. not much but it helps.
im sure you know this, but to others reading this dont set it over .99 volts
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by racerbox77:
Y2KSVT i spose your being a condesending with your question about the tps but ill entertain it.
optimized TPS meaning stock it read .92 volts. i changed it to .98 just like i do to all the mustangs ive owned. not much but it helps.
im sure you know this, but to others reading this dont set it over .99 volts
You are kidding right?
This mod does nothing.
The PCM uses the TPS reading based on the percentage of TPS deviation from it's static (or starting/idle/base) reading.
That static reading could be .75v or .99v and 60% TPS is still 60% TPS.
Changing the static position of the TPS does nothing.
For instance: In the stock code +60% from static indicates you have reached WOT. Regardless of what "static" is to begin with.
If static is 15% then 75% indicates WOT.
If static is 20% then 80% indicates WOT.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
