|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,270
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,270 |
I usually just push in, out of gear, let the pedal back out then stop, not hold the clutch down, and i don't like to downshift for various reasons, so just coast to a stop is what i do.
~Alex
Ex- SVT Driver627
MUST SELL!!!LOCAL:
Pre-98 MOLDED trunk
Polk db speakers
Corolla parts
LED Underbody Kit
PM
2000 Green CSVT gone on 2/17/06
2001 Toyota Corolla (SHE RUNS!!!)
1989 Mustang LX 5.0
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,693
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,693 |
I see that there have been a lot of issues raised here will I was gone for a day.
On the legality issue, I'm sure that it varies from state to state. As I remember when I was learning to drive here in California, the vehicle code stated that you could not coast down hill in neutral gears. This was in the days of drum only brakes and very poor ones at that. It was also when overdrive units would go into neutral under 30 mph when slowing down. That is how the units were designed. This is also at a time that every few months you would read of a semi loosing it's brakes and going out of control going down the grapevine grade (between Los Angeles and Bakersfield). Cars, trucks, and brakeing systems have all greatly improved since then. I have not seen this question show up on driving tests when I have renewed my license for many years. It was not a topic of discussion in any of my now grown kids driver education and driver training clases. Although I believe as I'm sure that all of you do that it would take an absolute idiot to try to take a car or a truck down the grapevine grade today in neutral using the brakes only.
On the stalling issue. Stalling an engine at idle isn't any more likely than an engine stalling on deceleration in gear (unless you forget to depress the clutch near the end).I'll make that statement not just on driving experience, but from years of experience as a drivability and tune up technician.
On the fuel economy issue. A difference in overall fuel consumption between closed throttle deceleration coming to a stop in normal driving and allowing the engine to idle by coming to a stop in neutral is insignificant. With a fuel injected car, in theory, the fuel economy would be slightly better with closed throttle and high vacuum, and I believe that indeed it would be, but hardly enough to see a difference when it's time to fill the tank. On a carberated engine, fuel economy is in the toilet on high vacuum closed throttle as the high vacuum sucks a lot of fuel through the idle ports. Again, for nearly all street driving, you are not likely to see the difference when it is time to fill the tank.
What it really boils down to, is that depending on driving situations, it is nice to know more than one way to bring your car to a stop. Just because of smoothness of operation on city streets it makes sense to kick the trans out of gear and coast toward a stop with gentle brake assistance if needed. Other times it makes more sense to select a gear or gears and be prepared for some eventuality.
Some of you may not want to hear this, but when I won an opportunity to take ten laps in a Winston Cup car at Fontana, they instructed us when bringing the car into the pits in the final approach in the pit lane (probably still doing about 50 to 60 mph), to kick the car into neutral and stop with the brakes. So it's done at Nascar (when appropriate) where control of the car is paramount.
Jim Johnson
98 SVT
03 Escape Limited
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,177
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,177 |
I have to agree with DemonSVT's statements about the possibility of stalling. It is, however not very likely, but it can happen.
Personally I have never stalled my old Mystique like that, but I have definitely felt the power drop, and observed lights dimming when brakes are pressed. I sometimes even see this when pulling into my driveway, popping the clutch at between 15-30pmh and making a 90' degree turn whilst braking sharply. I've stalled a couple of other cars doing this, and had to tap the throttle a number of occaisions, but not on the duratec. It would depend on what your engine speed is whilst doing this though. If you're near to the stall line then you could stall it, but if you're up at 1,000rpms or more then you'll likely not notice more than the lights dimming a little and the throttle dropping before lifting up again.
1998.5 T-Red on Midnight Blue SVT
Build Number 5320 of 6535
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,368
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,368 |
Originally posted by Big Jim:
Some of you may not want to hear this, but when I won an opportunity to take ten laps in a Winston Cup car at Fontana, they instructed us when bringing the car into the pits in the final approach in the pit lane (probably still doing about 50 to 60 mph), to kick the car into neutral and stop with the brakes. So it's done at Nascar (when appropriate) where control of the car is paramount.
I can vouch for this, hell I even had to kill the engine before we even hit the pit lane!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,177
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,177 |
You will have increased stopping power with the car in neutral, or with clutch in, as the engine isn't driving the wheels anymore, so less resistance. Stalling, IMO, is not likely, but is possible. If you are dropping into neutral for a stop at 50/60mph I'm presuming that you are still above idle when you begin applying the brakes ... also I don't think you could stall a race car that easily either doing this as I would imagine idle would be well above stalling point. If you have an older vehicle which has a somewhat erratic idle, or for example the AC is draining power, then there is the possibility that you will dip just enough to get a stall. On a healthy engine I wouldn't imagine it happening anywhere near often.
1998.5 T-Red on Midnight Blue SVT
Build Number 5320 of 6535
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,693
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,693 |
On decel, the engine is not driving the wheels. It is adding resistance and as such is actually assisting the brakes. Depending on conditions, this may not be significant, or it can be very significant.
Jim Johnson
98 SVT
03 Escape Limited
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,177
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,177 |
Originally posted by Big Jim: On decel, the engine is not driving the wheels. It is adding resistance and as such is actually assisting the brakes. Depending on conditions, this may not be significant, or it can be very significant.
But surely, unless you a braking extremely softly, when applying braking power you are working against power sent from the engine to the transmission, even though that power is dropping it is still there. I can understand it assisting in slow braking but in fast braking, especially emergency braking, clutch in is best as there is no power being sent from the engine. At least this is the way I see it in my mind, the physics of this makes sense to me.
1998.5 T-Red on Midnight Blue SVT
Build Number 5320 of 6535
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,528
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,528 |
I kind of do both, depending on what the situation calls for. Sometimes I engine break till about 1000-1500, sometimes the distance from one acceleration to a stop is so short that I just leave it in the same gear till neautral or just go to neutral right after the acceleration.
XL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,693
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,693 |
Originally posted by Christian: Originally posted by Big Jim: On decel, the engine is not driving the wheels. It is adding resistance and as such is actually assisting the brakes. Depending on conditions, this may not be significant, or it can be very significant.
But surely, unless you a braking extremely softly, when applying braking power you are working against power sent from the engine to the transmission, even though that power is dropping it is still there. I can understand it assisting in slow braking but in fast braking, especially emergency braking, clutch in is best as there is no power being sent from the engine. At least this is the way I see it in my mind, the physics of this makes sense to me.
Once you lift your foot off the gas pedal, the power generated from the engine turns from propelling the car (positive power) to slowing the car (negative power). Surely you can feel that as you lift the throttle. While this is happening, the engine is assisting braking all the way down to engine idle.
Jim Johnson
98 SVT
03 Escape Limited
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,100
Addicted CEG\'er
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,100 |
Exactly.
In fact, pressing the clutch in is actually creating (in some small aspect) MORE work for the brakes. More control, sure, I won't argue the uses in the performance aspect (nascar, etc, as stated above).
Ray
'99 CSVT - Silver #222/276
In a constant state of blow-off euphoria.
Originally posted by Kremitthefrog: I like to wear dresses and use binoculars to watch grandmas across the street.
|
|
|
|
|