|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 331
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 331 |
Originally posted by 98ford2L: Supercharge that thing!
In good time, i want to see how fast i can get the car all engine first
99 Zetec Atx Se
17's w/yoko H4 rubber
Green and Black interior
CTA + header + big pipes = very loud
89 Mustang LX (stock for now)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by RTStabler51: do huh?Originally posted by DemonSVT: Stock 5.0's are quite slow.
I guess I just compare every thing to the POS track here.
No stock 14 second 5.0 Mustangs by a long shot!
Heck even ones with basic mods run low 15's.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 638
Veteran CEG\'er
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 638 |
I may be wrong, but I think even an '89 5.0 GT was barely factory rated in the high 14's.
5.0 Stangs, whether GT or LX have a tone of potential, it simply wasn't tapped from factory, something to do with people actually wanting to be able to afford the insurance ratings.
87 Mustang GT 5.0L TURBO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857 |
Originally posted by Pope: I may be wrong, but I think even an '89 5.0 GT was barely factory rated in the high 14's.
5.0 Stangs, whether GT or LX have a tone of potential, it simply wasn't tapped from factory, something to do with people actually wanting to be able to afford the insurance ratings.
not really true most 87-93 stangs were mid 14's right off the showroom floor....easliy pull 14.6@97 mph bone stcok....i've owned several and all of them ran 14's stock....even a stock 94-95's are quite capable of running 14.8@94 mph as well....now bump the timimg,and do a silencer/k&n,and a fresh tune and they are capable of mid to low 14's easily...
my 95 runs 14.1-14.2's all day long with only gears and a few bolt ons(long tube headers,exhaust,tb,maf,pullies)
new,new ride!
'99 svt
black/mnb
'95 mustang gt sold!
'98 svt #800 sold!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,248
CEG road warrior
|
CEG road warrior
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,248 |
Originally posted by mmarfan: Higher trap indicates more horsepower, and a lack of grip.
Yep....Kim's S/C Grand Am ran a 15.0 @101 MPH. 
Her best time was a 14.8, wanna run?
Hector
2003 Rally Red Mitsubishi Evolution VIII
257HP/259TQ
2005 Lapis Blue Mazda 6s
RET: 00 Cabernet Red Ford Contour Zetec ATX SUPERCHARGED
160HP/141TQ
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732 |
Originally posted by LoCo*NeedMtx*Zsc: Originally posted by mmarfan: Higher trap indicates more horsepower, and a lack of grip.
Yep....Kim's S/C Grand Am ran a 15.0 @101 MPH. 
Her best time was a 14.8, wanna run?
i ran the same time at 10mph slower (15.02 @ 91) when my car was a 3L ATX....and the tranny was jacked up
ill run ya when the new motor is in
Russell
Oval Port 3L Nearly Done
MTX75 w/ Homebrew Zetec FD and Torsen Complete
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,097
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,097 |
in a low weight LX with some traction bars and shorty headers people manage 13's...although not many
98 E0 SVT with some stuff
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760 |
Although true, its not as if ALL 5.0 Mustangs were mid 14 second cars. There are tons of different combos from the factory. A stock 5.0 AOD Convertible car is a mid-high 15 second car, etc etc.....the cars that typically made it into the 14s are the bare bones 5spd LXs.. Originally posted by chrisilversvt: Originally posted by Pope: I may be wrong, but I think even an '89 5.0 GT was barely factory rated in the high 14's.
5.0 Stangs, whether GT or LX have a tone of potential, it simply wasn't tapped from factory, something to do with people actually wanting to be able to afford the insurance ratings.
not really true most 87-93 stangs were mid 14's right off the showroom floor....easliy pull 14.6@97">14.6@97</a> mph bone stcok....i've owned several and all of them ran 14's stock....even a stock 94-95's are quite capable of running <a href="mailto:14.8@94 mph as well....now bump the timimg,and do a silencer/k&n,and a fresh tune and they are capable of mid to low 14's easily...
my 95 runs 14.1-14.2's all day long with only gears and a few bolt ons(long tube headers,exhaust,tb,maf,pullies)
Ryan
Trollin!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651 |
Originally posted by RTStabler51: Although true, its not as if ALL 5.0 Mustangs were mid 14 second cars. There are tons of different combos from the factory. A stock 5.0 AOD Convertible car is a mid-high 15 second car, etc etc.....the cars that typically made it into the 14s are the bare bones 5spd LXs..
Originally posted by chrisilversvt: Originally posted by Pope: I may be wrong, but I think even an '89 5.0 GT was barely factory rated in the high 14's.
5.0 Stangs, whether GT or LX have a tone of potential, it simply wasn't tapped from factory, something to do with people actually wanting to be able to afford the insurance ratings.
not really true most 87-93 stangs were mid 14's right off the showroom floor....easliy pull 14.6@97">14.6@97</a> mph bone stcok....i've owned several and all of them ran 14's stock....even a stock 94-95's are quite capable of running <a href="mailto:14.8@94 mph as well....now bump the timimg,and do a silencer/k&n,and a fresh tune and they are capable of mid to low 14's easily...
my 95 runs 14.1-14.2's all day long with only gears and a few bolt ons(long tube headers,exhaust,tb,maf,pullies)
Well first yes it ranged from 15.4's to 14.8. Yes ford rated the mustangs at 225 hp but they where actually putting out more numbers than that according to Rousch Racing. Yes it was so people can afford insurnace. I have been hearing that since mid 1985.
My brother driving a stock 1993 gt ran a 14.8. Pulleys and a H-pipe removed silencer and he ran a 14.3. SO they have alot of potential. IF you ask me i say go with a blower. Pro charge by the way. Can we say 12's all day 
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,100
Addicted CEG\'er
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,100 |
BTW: I would love his arm to be borken in a 45�º angle, please!
Ray
'99 CSVT - Silver #222/276
In a constant state of blow-off euphoria.
Originally posted by Kremitthefrog: I like to wear dresses and use binoculars to watch grandmas across the street.
|
|
|
|
|