|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,578
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,578 |
Originally posted by Buckshot77:
Hehe, all I can say is bring it. Mike's STi knows how my car runs.
 I heard about that one
Alex
00 T-Red/Tan SVTC
#1964/2150
167 HP @6800
153 TQ @3000
Sold-
98 'Tour SE 24V 5-spd
149 HP @5900
148 LB FT @4300
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,089
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,089 |
Originally posted by Buckshot77:
Nope, I'm running SVT cams in 99 3L heads on my ride.
Rick
fine 2nd Existing set 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
"Absolut Rara."
|
|
"Absolut Rara."
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223 |
Originally posted by Bananastazi:
FPR enrichment? - please this aint no redneck Camaro. 
He's running 42's with fuel enrichment coming from increased pulse-width from the ECU.
I think he's simply talking about a boost referenced FPR, not rising rate. It is imperative that the fuel pressure regulator be referenced to boost at 1:1 so that the fuel pressure is set relative to manifold pressure, rather than atmospheric otherwise fuel pressure effectively drops off as boost pressure rises.
Brad knows better than to promote the rising rate FPR bandaid crap, don't you Brad
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 10,015
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 10,015 |
Seeing as their vac line routing is as stock, then yes, it should be 1:1 with the intake manifold pressure.
2000 SVT Turbo 295hp/269ftlb@12psi
#1 for Bendix Brakes Kits!
Knuckles rebuilt w/new bearings $55
AUSSIE ENDLINKS $70
Gutted pre-cats $80/set
A lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
"Absolut Rara."
|
|
"Absolut Rara."
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223 |
Originally posted by Bananastazi:
Seeing as their vac line routing is as stock, then yes, it should be 1:1 with the intake manifold pressure.
yeah; of course, I didn't think to look at it while I was there, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,621
Redneck Troll
|
|
Redneck Troll
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,621 |
Originally posted by Rara:
Originally posted by Bananastazi:
FPR enrichment? - please this aint no redneck Camaro.
He's running 42's with fuel enrichment coming from increased pulse-width from the ECU.
I think he's simply talking about a boost referenced FPR, not rising rate. It is imperative that the fuel pressure regulator be referenced to boost at 1:1 so that the fuel pressure is set relative to manifold pressure, rather than atmospheric otherwise fuel pressure effectively drops off as boost pressure rises.
Brad knows better than to promote the rising rate FPR bandaid crap, don't you Brad
Yessirey Jim Bob, that shur iz a fancy turdbowed Escort you got there. Lemme hep ya wit dat fuul problum... Durrrrrrrr, where da carburator at?
My question for boost referenced FPR is valid, especially with the reported idle and driveability problems of this combination. Sounds like it just needs some more tuning if pressure is set up correctly. 
http://www.bnmotorsports.com
"And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my CEG brothers. And you will know I am the Moderator when I lay my vengeance upon you."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
