|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
So you're saying I should claim sub 5 second 0-60mph and sub 13 second 0-100mph. Who am I to argue then...  
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 241
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 241 |
I don't feel like figuring it out exactly, I guess about 9 seconds, and I have a video of it too. http://ymic.biz/vid/060ymicz.avi
'99 SilFro SE V6 MTX
Alpine CDA-9833, 12" L7, Pioneer 6x8's, Fidanza Short Throw, K&N Drop-In, Spec1 Clutch/Flywheel, WR Headers / Y-Pipe, TBz Cat, PRT Roll Resistors
Mods in queue:
Trubendz Res. Magnaflow Ex.
SVT UIM/LIM/Opt.TB
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Figure mine out while you are at it..
Back in stock form the SVT used to set down 7.1s 0-60 in the arizona desert using the good ole G-tech before some car jockey at the Ford stealership stole it out of my car. Grr!
With everything I've done to it, it is probably in the mid 5's based on traction. I get better times with lower boost than higher in the 0-60 range but I get better 1/4 mile times at higher boost. It's a toss up.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 105
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 105 |
Originally posted by ymicz:
I don't feel like figuring it out exactly, I guess about 9 seconds, and I have a video of it too.
http://ymic.biz/vid/060ymicz.avi
hmm... somethings defenetly wrong with your car man, no offense but that is slow or the older contours are alot faster. Did you even step on it all the way in first gear??? because when i do that i dont got traction most of the first gear expacialy when it hits 4,500 RPMs..
Last edited by 95ContourSE95; 05/21/05 07:55 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,116
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,116 |
There is something wrong with your car...yeeesh. launching at 2 grand and there is nothing coming from the tires...unless i can't hear it because of it being on tape. I launched my car the other day (just to move it) at almost 3K and I did a 10-15 foot burn out (but it was on concreate). Maybe it is something with 95's. 
95 SE MTX
svt exhaust
intake
deer killer
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 105
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 105 |
i got a 1995 too and i just did 15.5 stock, the year 1995 is defenetly the fastast one lol, and yes there is something very wrong with his car. and he couldnt even do a second gear burnout...with my car i burn them for atleast 2-3 sec, and i even get a chirp out of them in 3rd..
Last edited by 95ContourSE95; 05/21/05 08:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 148
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 148 |
Originally posted by 95ContourSE95:
i got a 1995 too and i just did 15.5 stock, the year 1995 is defenetly the fastast one lol, and yes there is something very wrong with his car. and he couldnt even do a second gear burnout...with my car i burn them for atleast 2-3 sec, and i even get a chirp out of them in 3rd..
OMG would you please stop posting on every single [censored] thread. i know you just got your first car but dont brag about your 1/4 mile time ANYMORE! It agrivates me that i see you spitting this [censored] out of your mouth on every single thread. i know i sound like i am BlTCHING but it has been proven over and over again.
IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO RUN A 15.5 @ 90 WITH A 2.5 60' UNLESS YOU HAVE A TURBO OR NITROUS OR ARE RUNNING ON RUBBER BANDS IN A 240HP CAR. BUT, IF THAT IS THE CASE, YOUR TRAP SPEED WOULD BE MUCH HIGHER. PLEASE STOP POSTING UNTIL WE SEE SLIPS.
Last edited by TrumpDrewSVT; 05/22/05 02:17 PM.
1998 Black SVT (#469 on 4-24-1997)
Custom Cougars CAI
Custom Magnaflow exhaust
opt. jet-hot-coated Y-pipe
B&M short shifter
Stazi Rotor & Brake kit
17x7 Enkei RO56's
Mirco Splitter
15.45 @ 89.03 (Stock /w worn clutch)
172HP 164TRQ (stock)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 638
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 638 |
Originally posted by TrumpDrewSVT:
IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO RUN A 15.5 @ 90 WITH A 2.5 60' UNLESS YOU HAVE A TURBO OR NITROUS OR ARE RUNNING ON RUBBER BANDS IN A 240HP CAR.
Me car #518, 15.6 ET with a 2.6 60'
I'm running a better than stock SVT, which is of-course better than his '95 whatever, but I know I can run 2.3 60' @ 14.9 ET, so mathematically it is possible to do a 15.5 @ 90 with a 2.5 60' No Nitrous, No Turbo and no Rubber Bands, I agree that he needs to stop running his mouth without posting his slips, but people also need to stop saying it's impossible to do.
Last edited by Pope; 05/22/05 11:08 PM.
87 Mustang GT 5.0L TURBO
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 148
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 148 |
Originally posted by Pope:
Originally posted by TrumpDrewSVT:
IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO RUN A 15.5 @ 90 WITH A 2.5 60' UNLESS YOU HAVE A TURBO OR NITROUS OR ARE RUNNING ON RUBBER BANDS IN A 240HP CAR.
Me car #518, 15.6 ET with a 2.6 60'
I'm running a better than stock SVT, which is of-course better than his '95 whatever, but I know I can run 2.3 60' @ 14.9 ET, so mathematically it is possible to do a 15.5 @ 90 with a 2.5 60' No Nitrous, No Turbo and no Rubber Bands, I agree that he needs to stop running his mouth without posting his slips, but people also need to stop saying it's impossible to do.
dude man. it is impossible to do. on a good run your car traps at 93mph. your car is obviously not a stock contour by any means. even on your sahitty half ass run you trapped at 91mph. yes mathmatically it is possible.... if you [censored] up alot in a higher horse power car that would make it seem like it as your time slip shows.
1998 Black SVT (#469 on 4-24-1997)
Custom Cougars CAI
Custom Magnaflow exhaust
opt. jet-hot-coated Y-pipe
B&M short shifter
Stazi Rotor & Brake kit
17x7 Enkei RO56's
Mirco Splitter
15.45 @ 89.03 (Stock /w worn clutch)
172HP 164TRQ (stock)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 638
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 638 |
Don't get me wrong, I completely agree that his car is not turning the times he's saying, unless he's got a lot more done to it than he says, I'm just pointing out that it is possible to do.
87 Mustang GT 5.0L TURBO
|
|
|
|
|
