Originally posted by caltour:
Well, Packrat nailed his argument. Solid reasoning, well explained.

But where does that leave me? My job is to antagonize Packrat, but he's not giving me anything to work with.



If this was in California, the school administration would have defended its actions by saying it was protecting the student from potential brain cancer since cell phones are known to the state of California to cause brain cancer in lab rats or something like that.