|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,281
Captain Impound Boy
|
Captain Impound Boy
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,281 |
These pics are funny thats all im saying...
HAHAHAHAHA
PS Sandia Labratories makes Nuclear Weapons or the saftey divices for them... I have held my video confrences and in person meetings with them. Insteresting stuff
PS that pic is funny HA!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,099
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,099 |
Originally posted by sigma:
Originally posted by mmars:
Originally posted by sigma:
Originally posted by mmars:
Originally posted by Kane:
Originally posted by sigma:
Originally posted by mmars:
Photos like these need to be removed. We don't need to see this stuff. There are too many places that can be seen which do not need to be seen on there.
If the government didn't want them seen they wouldn't be seen. Any satelite imagery that is public domain has been carefully scrutinized by the government. You'll notice that throughout sattelite imagery there are big blocks cut out or areas covered over with large cicles where many military installations are.
...or not detailed enough to be able to make anything out... like the restricted areas here.
So your saying it's ok to give anyone an arial view of our military bases?
If the government didn't think so they wouldn't allow the imagery to be public domain.
Unfortunatly these photos fall under the first ammendment. It should be google's responsibility to remove them.
Again, as I said, the government wouldn't make the images public domain if it didn't want them to be. Yes, the government decides what will be allowed to be photographed.
Not just anyone can put a satellite into orbit and distribute the photographs -- not in this country anyways. Every country that has the capability of putting satellites into orbit has similar policies/laws/executive orders.
Only a select few companies have authorization to put imagery sattelites into orbit and they are dictated where and what resolution they are allowed to take images from called "shutter restrictions". The restrictions extend outside of the US as well. US companies aren't allowed to sell good imagery from Israel or many other allies either, for example. These policies are generally reciprocated -- we won't allow our companies to image Israel and they won't allow their companies to image us.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
2003 Sonic Blue SVT Cobra Coupe
2003 RedFire SVT Cobra Convertable
2005 Dark Toreador Red F150 XLT 4x4
2000 Black SVT Contour - Beater
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220 |
Originally posted by mmars:
Originally posted by sigma:
Originally posted by mmars:
Originally posted by sigma:
Originally posted by mmars:
Originally posted by Kane:
Originally posted by sigma:
Originally posted by mmars:
Photos like these need to be removed. We don't need to see this stuff. There are too many places that can be seen which do not need to be seen on there.
If the government didn't want them seen they wouldn't be seen. Any satelite imagery that is public domain has been carefully scrutinized by the government. You'll notice that throughout sattelite imagery there are big blocks cut out or areas covered over with large cicles where many military installations are.
...or not detailed enough to be able to make anything out... like the restricted areas here.
So your saying it's ok to give anyone an arial view of our military bases?
If the government didn't think so they wouldn't allow the imagery to be public domain.
Unfortunatly these photos fall under the first ammendment. It should be google's responsibility to remove them.
Again, as I said, the government wouldn't make the images public domain if it didn't want them to be. Yes, the government decides what will be allowed to be photographed.
Not just anyone can put a satellite into orbit and distribute the photographs -- not in this country anyways. Every country that has the capability of putting satellites into orbit has similar policies/laws/executive orders.
Only a select few companies have authorization to put imagery sattelites into orbit and they are dictated where and what resolution they are allowed to take images from called "shutter restrictions". The restrictions extend outside of the US as well. US companies aren't allowed to sell good imagery from Israel or many other allies either, for example. These policies are generally reciprocated -- we won't allow our companies to image Israel and they won't allow their companies to image us.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Any idiot can say someone is wrong. It takes intelligence to prove it.
And just to save you the trouble, here's a few key items you'll want to look at in your attempt to gain knowledge of the subject that you know so little about:
Clinton's PDD-23 (this is the main one)
The Land Remote Sensing Policy Act
Bush's National Security Presidential Directive
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
Just googling PDD-23 should tell you all that you need to know on the subject before spouting off about it.
2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX
Webpage
2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,100
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,100 |
Originally posted by sigma:
Just googling PDD-23 should tell you all that you need to know on the subject before spouting off about it.
So, in light of the topic, would this be:
"OHHHHHH.. SPACIAL BURN!!!! 0wn3d...", or what?
Ray
'99 CSVT - Silver #222/276
In a constant state of blow-off euphoria.
Originally posted by Kremitthefrog:
I like to wear dresses and use binoculars to watch grandmas across the street.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,228
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,228 |
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v189/lowbudgetracing/area51051.jpg[/img[ eek! what's that ribbon like black UFO in the sky?!? 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117 |
Originally posted by Kane:
Originally posted by svt4stv:
GREAT! now we're all f*cked! thanks for posting this sh*t!  we've all seen too much now to be allowed to live 
Heh... yeah, did that on purpose 
Uh, I don't see anything... Just a red 'x' again. Yeah, that's it, I don't see a thing.
by the way, looks like a photoshop to me. You can still see some of the contours of the terrain under the supposed 'airstrip'.
scroll due north & see the ground zero setup they got. Huge concentric rings in a dry lake bed.
to the SW of the lake bed at the interface with the foothills is a big crater - former underground test site perhaps?
Enjoy.
Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,667
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,667 |
Originally posted by Toadster:
eek! what's that ribbon like black UFO in the sky?!?
fixed 
Diesel owns you
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117 |
Originally posted by mbTDI:
Originally posted by Toadster:
eek! what's that ribbon like black UFO in the sky?!?
fixed
[Gvt hat on] Lint on camera lense. [Gvt hat off]
Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 713
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 713 |
i resized the pics with MS paint and must have made that line
98 svt sil/blu 3.0 oval heads full P&P, msds headers,bat kit,2,1/2exhaust 30 inch glasspack and 2 spintech mufflers 14.78@94mph
with my mechanical arm i can shift gears in less then a twentieth of a second for sale $7000
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,816
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
OP
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,816 |
Originally posted by TourDeForce:
Originally posted by Kane:
Originally posted by svt4stv:
GREAT! now we're all f*cked! thanks for posting this sh*t! we've all seen too much now to be allowed to live
Heh... yeah, did that on purpose
Uh, I don't see anything... Just a red 'x' again. Yeah, that's it, I don't see a thing.
by the way, looks like a photoshop to me. You can still see some of the contours of the terrain under the supposed 'airstrip'.
scroll due north & see the ground zero setup they got. Huge concentric rings in a dry lake bed.
to the SW of the lake bed at the interface with the foothills is a big crater - former underground test site perhaps?
Enjoy.
Maybe you're right... If it's an old test site, maybe it's an unmaintained airstrip they either forgot about or don't care to mention.
I wonder what they do if it's unmaintained. Like the runway here hasn't been maintained since the mid 90s. Yep... I'm at an Air Force base without any planes 
Originally posted by TourDeForce:
Originally posted by mbTDI:
Originally posted by Toadster:
eek! what's that ribbon like black UFO in the sky?!?
fixed
[Gvt hat on] Lint on camera lense. [Gvt hat off]
Kinda on that subject... was coming home last night and a car full of girls had aluminum foil hats on. They were actin all silly too. 
|
|
|
|
|
