|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
Originally posted by spgoode: No, indirect is not the opposite of direct.
'Indirect', according to you, is 'anything but direct'. An inverse proportion is 'anything but direct', given the definition of an inverse proportion. Therefore, 'inverse proportion' and 'indirect proportion' are the same thing.
This is quite possibly the studiest argument I have ever participated in.
|
|
|
|
|
|