|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by spgoode:
Originally posted by PDXSVT:
do you think Scalia is here saying that even when NEW DNA evidence could prove after a conviction that a guy on death row is really innocent, he still has NO right to have his death sentance reconsidered? From Herrera v. Collins, 506 US 390 (1993):
I guess that's what it means to be a strict contstructionist! DNA is not evidence in the constitution.
Originally posted by PDXSVT:
Justice Scalia, with whom Justice Thomas joins, concurring.
Thomas alway concurs with Scalia, like his little beotch.
Does that make you PDXSVT's little beotch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
