Originally posted by 99SESPORT:
Originally posted by Kremithefrog:
My professor, a lawyer, sorta wants it to be upheld by the court so he can then start filing suits for all prisoners in georgia on death row as they seemingly also would have a right to life. He would do it pro bono just to prove to congress how stupid their decision was.



Yeah, same difference!! Does anybody else see the similarity?

One lady has medical problems, the only thing keeping her alive is what? Oh yeah, food.

So many people are on death row? Why? Oh, that's right, they committed a crime of heinous proportion.

Similarity is abundant!!



You have to THINK for a minute. Similarily in the sense of the cases being similar isn't what this is about, it's about the CONSTITUTION. Equal protection as described in the constitution should have never allowed congress to make their decision for ONE person. Their decision applies to NOONE else, except this one person. So in theory, anybody that is in the position to be legally "killed" no matter why (cases like this, abortions, death row inmates), would have the same right to have congress decide. Congress can't go and decide every right to life case, and they should have realized that and not made their stupid decision.

98.5 SVT 91 Escort GT (almost sold) 96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve) FS: SVT rear sway bar WTB: Very cheap beater CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15