Originally posted by PDXSVT:
do you think Scalia is here saying that even when NEW DNA evidence could prove after a conviction that a guy on death row is really innocent, he still has NO right to have his death sentance reconsidered? From Herrera v. Collins, 506 US 390 (1993):
I guess that's what it means to be a strict contstructionist! DNA is not evidence in the constitution.
Originally posted by PDXSVT:
Justice Scalia, with whom Justice Thomas joins, concurring.
Thomas alway concurs with Scalia, like his little beotch.
Dueling Duratecs
'95 SE V6 MTX 0 Mods
'04 Mazda6 S Wagon
'03 Kawasaki Z1000
But thus do I counsel you, my friends: distrust all in whom the impulse to punish is powerful!
Friedrich Nietzsche
| 
