At least you are talking some sense now. I agree with your cooling and thermal mass comment though in this case they are closely balanced enough that I believe bias is the culprit here.
Apparently you didn't see or understand the "as long as the you aren't locking up any wheel" part of my message.
Most Cg / weight distributions combinations on the road can easily get to 0.3g without locking the rears. Prove me wrong.
So you are at least admitting that where the weight is in the vehicle isn't ANY factor in determining where the energy is disappated (at braking levels below tire lock up, again).
You are going to think this is all non-sense, but it actually is material in the "knee" in the bias curve that TCE brought up.
For example, you could have a setup that overheats the rears in low braking conditions, but still under-biases (correctly) them in panic stops. I'm not saying my vehicle has that condition, though.
As to the choir support, it is funny how easily they overlook your mistatements to flame those making a valid correction.
