Originally posted by CLASSVT:
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by gsxr907:
All I am saying is this SE-R is the CSVT of 2005.
I strongly disagree.
...it's ugly.
-Survey says...???...
(Loud Buzzer Sounds)
Sorry wrong answer, the cash prize will go to the other team. But thanks for playing! 
Sure everybody is entitled to their opinions, unles the opinion is flat out wrong. And seriously people, what's with raining on this guy's parade so much. Whether it is the CSVT of '05 or not...enjoy your car dude. I think it's pretty bad-a$$.
I can't stand wooses.
People have differing opinions. Just because they differ doesn't make them "haters" or anything.
I think it's a neat car. Just not worth 29k and certainly not the most exact SVT-C substitute. But that's MHO.
Still, I'd be happy to see one up close and watch it in action and listen to that beautiful 3.5.
Function before fashion.
'96 Contour SE
"Toss the Contour into a corner, and it's as easy to catch as a softball thrown by a preschooler." -Edmunds, 1998
| 
