|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220 |
Quote:
What? Care to elaborate? No Mazda3 I've seen, even with MTX has crossed the 7 second line to sixty.
But I forget that you guys have a constant plague with comparing modified cars to cars that come with that performance right out of the box.
First off, there's not a single mod done to the 3. And last time I went to the track, we didn't race based on who got to 60 first. Nor did I say that the 3 would win, just that it would "give it a run for it's money". The 3 would lose by about as much as my 6 would win -- about half a second. The point was the irony that a relatively heavy, FWD 4-door hatchback with a 2.3l would even be in the same league as a RWD 4.0L 'muscle car'.
I don't have a problem with the V6 Mustang. Not at all. Just with the narcissistic attitude that the majority people who drive them have. Yeah, 76% of the Mustang market is V6s -- but 90% of that 76% think they're the hottest and fastest [censored] in the world.
2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX
Webpage
2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX
|
|
|
|
|
|