Iâ??m going to chime in on this one.
I believe the human body can be a beautiful inspiration for art. However, I believe when the human body is used to express art it is a fine line that can cross over to pornography easily. Iâ??m not even suggesting that the photos of Jenna or yourself are that. It really is how one sees it. My personal opinion on what I find sexy are the less graphic photos that leave something to the imagination. It leaves a sense of mystery to the beholder. It stays with you when your imagination is involved. If itâ??s all laid out for you to see, then youâ??ve seen it and thatâ??s it. Think pin up girls of the 1940-50â??s. To this day they are very sexy. The two previous photos you posted, kind of fit into that.

I agree with Aaron about posting â??artsyâ? photos of your wife. I have met Jenna and she is a lovely girl. Iâ??m sure your photos are amazing, but I think they should be kept for you, her husband and if shown, it be done for arts sake. A car forum with a bunch of young horny guys and girls is not the place to honor your art or your wife, regardless of if she approves. People will look at and treat her differently.

I am a photographer, I have a darkroom, and I have been doing this since I was twelve. If I was over at your house Iâ??d probably be interested in seeing them, more for the composition you used, not the nudity or art of it.
I am no means a prude and I would be the worldâ??s biggest hypocrite if I said I was. If you choose to show your art, show it in the proper forum, not a car forum.

Photographic art the way I interpret it is the photo of a model, the identity of the model is irrelevant. This is the way art should be seen. Most people here wonâ??t see it as art because they know or know of Jenna.

With the build up this subject has received, it will no matter how you try for it not to, this will be a post of Rayâ??s naked hot wife instead of the beauty of the human body.

Suck it Trebek! And by Trebek I mean Seaegee!