|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by TourDeForce:
Originally posted by FreeShyne:
Originally posted by SVTDarin:
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by SVTDarin:
The 1/2 pipe cap with a 7/32" hole fixed the throttle hang I had and the moose. My car has an open filter (don't know what brand) and it had the TSB parts for the moose but still had the moose.
Perhaps that's why it's called the TH (Throttle Hang) Fix...  
My point was suppose to be more for the fact it fixed the moose. 
I think his point was "no [censored], that is what it is supposed to do"...
Easy now. Let's play nice and not read into each others posts... 
Very little reading skill involved.
That's exactly what I meant but I just stated it more politely.
It is a well know fact (or at least over posted) that the TH fix stops the moose.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
To play "mean" I suppose.
Here are Ray's own words directly out of the FAQ.
"The addition of the throttle hange restrictor plug has been reported to also fix the Mr. Moose (see related section on this page) issue without using the Ford Moose "bagpipe tube/hoses."
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,012
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,012 |
Originally posted by TourDeForce:
Originally posted by FreeShyne:
But isn't that how you get your post count up? You do it, why can't I?? 
My posts are typically not harsh, and usually not critical. Up your post count? Go for it! Just contribute to the community rather than give it a black eye. 
Neither are mine, but I also don't post things that are obvious like "It's been 3,000 miles since my last oil change, so I changed it today." Better a black eye than a lobotomy...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117 |
Fine. I understood your original post, and had no issues with it. I even remember the reference to the moose in the FAQ. I thought Freeshynes follow up was redundant at best, and perhaps even a bit coarse. I was just trying to encourage keeping the tone civil.
I'm done here.
Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,012
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,012 |
My deepest apologies...I didn't realize everyone had become so sensitive. I will adjust fire accordingly  ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
