Originally posted by SVTNupe:
Originally posted by Freakshow:
I don't see anyway you can call them co champs after they barely beat VT.


"Barely beat?" That does make me angry because you obviously didn't watch the game. AU never trailed and didn't even attempt a pass for the final 12 minutes. It was run, run, run, and guess what? Run. You sound like one of those caught up in "style points." Those folks need to go throw a wing and some yellow stickers on their car and find a car show; this is a discussion of sports.



What about the games where OU and USC barely beat the oppenents they were suppose to run all over? Bottom line, USC, AU, and OU all had games that were close; and has been stated, one's margin of victory should have very little to do with the discussion of who the better team is.


I'm talking about WITHIN the current system. I'm not even saying I like the current setup but within this setup there is no way Auburn can claim a piece of the national championship. According to the system in place the #1 and #2 teams played each other. Had Auburn severely whipped VT and the USC vs OU game been close then there may have been some potential for Auburn to claim a pice of the championship, but that didn't happen and that was all I was pointing out.

Formerly known as Sneaku I MISS MY BABY!!! '00 Blk CSVT #1087/2150 built 12/23/99