|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3
Banned
|
OP
Banned
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by oandaxm: www.walmartwatch.com
Thanks for sharing some propaganda [censored] with your second post ever.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3
Banned
|
OP
Banned
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3 |
Originally posted by PackRat: Originally posted by oandaxm: www.walmartwatch.com
Thanks for sharing some propaganda [censored] with your second post ever.
Propaganda? These are KNOWN facts that they did these things. I think Wal-Mart has brainwashed you.
What about current and past employees suing them for employment practices? Locking in employees in stores? Making employees work OFF the clock? Or NOT paying overtime unless the employee complains?
I disagree 100% of what Target has done, but I don�t think Wal-Mart are bunch of saints.
http://www.wal-martlitigation.com/currentd.htm
Last edited by oandaxm; 12/23/04 11:34 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by oandaxm: Originally posted by PackRat: Originally posted by oandaxm: www.walmartwatch.com
Thanks for sharing some propaganda [censored] with your second post ever.
Propaganda? These are KNOWN facts that they did these things. I think Wal-Mart has brainwashed you.
Known facts blown out of proportion by pro-union pinheads. If anyone is brainwashed, it's Union members. [censored] unions!
Quote:
What about current and past employees suing them for employment practices?
Like those ladies who didn't get promoted when they felt they should? Not everyone gets promoted when they feel they should, life's not fair.
Quote:
Locking in employees in stores?
Quote:
Making employees work OFF the clock?
Quote:
Or NOT paying overtime unless the employee complains?
Those were decisions made by individual managers and are NOT Wal-Mart policy. Those individual managers had to face the music for their poor judgement. I can say that I have never been forced to work off the clock or not paid overtime and neither has anyone I work with and I work with quite a few people that have 5, 10 or more years with the company.
That's like blaming a car maker because the dealership you deal with is incompetent.
Quote:
I disagree 100% of what Target has done, but I don�t think Wal-Mart are bunch of saints.
http://www.wal-martlitigation.com/currentd.htm
You can take your propaganda and shove it. You WON'T win this one with me.
Last edited by PackRat; 12/23/04 11:39 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
oandaxm = Jared
I guarantee it. Even with his new names all the time, he sticks out like a sore thumb.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,431
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,431 |
Originally posted by Davo: oandaxm = Jared
I guarantee it. Even with his new names all the time, he sticks out like a sore thumb.
Good call!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by Davo: oandaxm = Jared
I guarantee it. Even with his new names all the time, he sticks out like a sore thumb.
I have a feeling you are right. I mean who else would start off posting that way?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,506
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,506 |
I can conceed for the sake of argument that the actions alleged within those cases were taken by individual managers. But the decisions to NOT settle those cases and to resist them 100% of the way through trial, and to likely argue to the jury that Walmart did absolutely nothing wrong, those were NOT the decisions of a few isolated rogue managers. THOSE decisions WERE made by big fish in the company, the big fish who set the company's vision, the big fish who write the company's mission statements, the big fish who DO set company policy. Even you, Packrat, cannot think decisions over multi-million dollar, high profile public cases like those are just delegated to the second shift manager in paper goods at some store in Jackalope South Dakota. Your "it was the individual managers" defense demonstrates the lack of thought you've given this topic.
Now who's the pinhead?
Meanwhile Packrat, is there PERHAPS a miniscule, distant, remote possibility that the UAW, while it certainly has its corruption and flaws, did not go to bat for you, because of you? Are you SUCH a saint, that could NEVER possibly be any factor whatsoever? Gee whiz, you're so well spoken and reasonable, why would they be pleased to rid themselves of a model member like you?
And if you were so screwed over, please remember that YOU neither researched nor pursued your breach of fair representation rights against the UAW. I guess you would not learn about that while watching Maury.
Have a nice day.
MSDS, SHO-shop Y, custom 2.5" catback; xcal2; 63mm TB, K&N 3530; Koni struts, Aussie bar; THaines forks, Quaife, SpecII, UR fly; DMD; Nima UD pullies; Stazi brakes; f&r Pole120 mounts. Just a daily commuter car. Silver '98 SVT E0 #3159
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by PDXSVT: I can conceed for the sake of argument that the actions alleged within those cases were taken by individual managers. But the decisions to NOT settle those cases and to resist them 100% of the way through trial, and to likely argue to the jury that Walmart did absolutely nothing wrong, those were NOT the decisions of a few isolated rogue managers. THOSE decisions WERE made by big fish in the company, the big fish who set the company's vision, the big fish who write the company's mission statements, the big fish who DO set company policy. Even you, Packrat, cannot think decisions over multi-million dollar, high profile public cases like those are just delegated to the second shift manager in paper goods at some store in Jackalope South Dakota. Your "it was the individual managers" defense demonstrates the lack of thought you've given this topic.
Now who's the pinhead?
Meanwhile Packrat, is there PERHAPS a miniscule, distant, remote possibility that the UAW, while it certainly has its corruption and flaws, did not go to bat for you, because of you? Are you SUCH a saint, that could NEVER possibly be any factor whatsoever? Gee whiz, you're so well spoken and reasonable, why would they be pleased to rid themselves of a model member like you?
And if you were so screwed over, please remember that YOU neither researched nor pursued your breach of fair representation rights against the UAW. I guess you would not learn about that while watching Maury.
Have a nice day.
My nuts sure are sore from you riding them all the [censored] time.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,506
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,506 |
Packrat, I never give you a difficult time when you're well-reasoned.
Maybe that's why they are sore ALL the time.
Merry Christmas.
MSDS, SHO-shop Y, custom 2.5" catback; xcal2; 63mm TB, K&N 3530; Koni struts, Aussie bar; THaines forks, Quaife, SpecII, UR fly; DMD; Nima UD pullies; Stazi brakes; f&r Pole120 mounts. Just a daily commuter car. Silver '98 SVT E0 #3159
|
|
|
|
|