Register Log In

Contour Enthusiasts Group Archives Forums Modifications Duratec Performance early 2.5 vs later 2.5?

Print Thread

Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5? #112756 01/24/02 12:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 4,899 The land of B18s T TheGSRGuy Member
TheGSRGuy Member T Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 4,899 The land of B18s	Oh man, more arguing on this. It seems that we always have conflicting sources on this, but Ford says 195 for 1998, and 200 for 1999+. There was rumors of a 205hp rating for 2000, but was this ever confirmed? Dan Parmelee 1999 Acura Integra SiR-G coupe "I heard Affleck was the bomb in Phantoms" "Word, bitch! Phantoms like a muhfuka"

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	SSR SVT 1	01/22/02 02:31 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Big Jim	01/22/02 05:36 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	SVTJOE	01/23/02 05:43 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	bnoon	01/23/02 02:05 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	DemonSVT	01/23/02 10:01 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Procyon	01/24/02 05:45 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Big Jim	01/24/02 06:01 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	DemonSVT	01/24/02 07:48 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	TheGSRGuy	01/24/02 12:16 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	breidy	01/24/02 01:46 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	SSR SVT 1	01/24/02 02:18 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	todras	01/24/02 09:02 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	DemonSVT	01/25/02 04:12 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Big Jim	01/25/02 05:23 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Procyon	01/25/02 06:02 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Procyon	01/31/02 10:50 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	DemonSVT	02/01/02 04:55 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Procyon	02/01/02 05:43 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	n2deep	02/02/02 12:52 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Procyon	02/04/02 05:59 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Contouraholic	02/04/02 08:41 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Iceman22	02/04/02 08:53 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	PA 3L SVT	02/04/02 10:30 PM

Moderated by GTO Pete

Link Copied to Clipboard

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5