Register Log In

Contour Enthusiasts Group Archives Forums Modifications Duratec Performance early 2.5 vs later 2.5?

Print Thread

Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5? #112749 01/22/02 05:36 AM
Joined: Sep 2000 Posts: 1,861 Thousand Oaks, California, USA B Big Jim Member
Big Jim Member B Joined: Sep 2000 Posts: 1,861 Thousand Oaks, California, USA	The 98 E0 and E1 are the same. The 99 has 5 more HP due to more agressive extrude honing of the intake. As you already know, the 2000 has slightly less displacement, but higher compression. Jim Johnson 98 SVT

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	SSR SVT 1	01/22/02 02:31 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Big Jim	01/22/02 05:36 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	SVTJOE	01/23/02 05:43 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	bnoon	01/23/02 02:05 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	DemonSVT	01/23/02 10:01 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Procyon	01/24/02 05:45 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Big Jim	01/24/02 06:01 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	DemonSVT	01/24/02 07:48 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	TheGSRGuy	01/24/02 12:16 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	breidy	01/24/02 01:46 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	SSR SVT 1	01/24/02 02:18 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	todras	01/24/02 09:02 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	DemonSVT	01/25/02 04:12 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Big Jim	01/25/02 05:23 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Procyon	01/25/02 06:02 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Procyon	01/31/02 10:50 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	DemonSVT	02/01/02 04:55 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Procyon	02/01/02 05:43 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	n2deep	02/02/02 12:52 AM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Procyon	02/04/02 05:59 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Contouraholic	02/04/02 08:41 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	Iceman22	02/04/02 08:53 PM
Re: early 2.5 vs later 2.5?	PA 3L SVT	02/04/02 10:30 PM

Moderated by GTO Pete

Link Copied to Clipboard

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5