|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
Hard-core CEG'er
|
OP
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970 |
Which is heavier, Zetec or Duratec? I think I have read/heard that the Zetec is because it's cast iron. Anyone know for sure?
2005 Ford F150 SuperCab FX4
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
1998 CSVT: 354HP/328TQ @ 10 psi, now gone 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,910
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,910 |
I always thought the zetec was a bit lighter and hense why it feels a little more nible then a duratec car and had a slightly better turning radius
- 95 Mystique LS - Zetec/5spd
- 99 Contour SeVT Sport - Duratec/5spd
Official NE-CEG Contour/Mustang Family
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
OP
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970 |
Another reason I think the zetec is heavier is because the H&R springs for both have the same part number, but a differen't sized drop in the front.......
2005 Ford F150 SuperCab FX4
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
1998 CSVT: 354HP/328TQ @ 10 psi, now gone
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975 |
By different sized do you mean, it doesn't have as low as a drop as a v6 hence heavier or do you mean it doens't drop as much meaning it's lighter...?
1992 Ford Escort LX-E
-Tracer LTS spoiler
-GT Grille
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
OP
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970 |
Oops, I must have been looking at it wrong. There are different amounts of drop for the 95/96 and the 97+. It doesn't show a different spring for a 4cyl and the V6.........sorry, I had a brain fart 
2005 Ford F150 SuperCab FX4
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
1998 CSVT: 354HP/328TQ @ 10 psi, now gone
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by brapple:
I always thought the zetec was a bit lighter and hense why it feels a little more nible then a duratec car and had a slightly better turning radius
Turning radius is controlled by the rack and steering stops.
The engine weights for either engine are very close.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 127
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 127 |
The Zetec is 50lbs lighter
Cougar V6 MTX: GMK Carbon Fiber Cold Air Intake : SVT UIM : SVT LIM : SVT TB : MSDS Headers & Ypipe : TruBendz 2.5" Borla Single Exhaust : Soild Front Motor Mount : & more
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,732 |
my bronco2 has the smallest turning radius of ANY vehicle i ever drove!
Russell
Oval Port 3L Nearly Done
MTX75 w/ Homebrew Zetec FD and Torsen Complete
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 467
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 467 |
And probably highest likelyhood to roll over. I'd still drive one though.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
I have no life
|
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653 |
Originally posted by GrandMasterKhan:
The Zetec is 50lbs lighter
About dat.
98.5 SVT
91 Escort GT (almost sold)
96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve)
FS: SVT rear sway bar
WTB: Very cheap beater
CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
