|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,709
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,709 |
H&R's/ Konis and 17" RS5's 
Originally posted by Chickens:
Religion can't do much for ashholes (unless you are an alterboy)
98.5 Se w/SVT mods
98 E0 SVT~ sold
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,392
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,392 |
H&R's/stock struts with 17" mille miglias....
02 Mustang GT... Tuned by Nelsons. Low 12's, anyone? 
.....______
___|______\_____
|/-\_________/-\_|
.\_/...............\_/
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,676
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,676 |
Originally posted by JonnySVT:
Originally posted by Wien_Sean:
I had Eibachs with Konis and the car stayed flat in hard turns. It was used for AutoX before I got it so assume the Eibachs do just as well as the H&Rs if not better. I did notice the sag in the back, but it was not so evident unless you were looking for it.
just because it was used in auto-xing before you got it doesn't mean that Eibachs are better than H&Rs.... 
No but I seem to remember hearing that the Eibachs were better, I don't remember where. I don't even have the car anymore
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,882
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
OP
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,882 |
Originally posted by JonnySVT:
An "optimal" setup for LOOKS only wold be H&Rs up front with Eibachs out back. Other than that, these two springs create two different looks. Steve, you saw my car at the track, I have Eibachs. Did you notice any rear end sag look? At times it's noticeable, but most of the time it's not. Also depends on if you want springs for performance or looks. H&Rs are recommended for performance while Eibachs are more for looks, respectively.
your car looked f*ckin beautiful. did you have 17z? it looked LOwwww. 
Originally posted by Tourgasm:
Sometimes you can mess up a word so bad that spell check doens't know what the hell you're talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 839
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 839 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,872
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,872 |
Originally posted by Goonz SVT:
how much does the combination go for? 
#0009
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,838
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,838 |
Here's my ride , sitting on 16" Cellos with H&R springs . It dropped the car near 2" , nice and level . I have loads more pics in my sig  .
~~~~~~~ Phil
Black & Tan 2000 SVT Contour #2137 of 2150
35,000 miles & counting !
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,571
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,571 |
i will post pics monday but go with intrax, they give the lowest drop you can get on a tour 1.8 and 1.7 they are amazing. i love mine
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,423
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,423 |
Originally posted by wa2tuff:
Originally posted by scottd60:
Eibach's with 17 x 7 in. Focus SVT wheels and Continental ContiSport Contact 215/45WR-17 tires, stock SVT Struts (Koni's go on in the Spring) 
Eibach's gave me ~1.75" or more drop...NOT 1.2" - 1.3"
Scott
I'm still not gettin this. I have Eibach's and Bilstein's. If I look into the wheelwell, the top of my front tire is exactly 2" below the fender lip. Yours looks much less--what is it? I will end up with H&R's in the front and Eibach's in the rear. My tires are 215/45-17's.
What's in your trunk? 50lb's of amps and subs? There is nothing in my trunk but a rear strut tower brace. Maybe you put the wrong springs on the front and rear  While I don't think that is possible...maybe not really what you thought you got.
Scott
Scott
2000 Contour SVT #1464
Mustang Dyno: 171.6hp/145.3lb
Dynojet Dyno: 171.1hp/148.9lb
1989 20th Anniversary Turbo T/A "Indy 500 Pace Car"
#1376 of 1550 All Original, 46k with a few mods
2002 F150 SuperCrew
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 20
New CEG\'er
|
|
New CEG\'er
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 20 |
I have h&r's with bat shocks. The ride is nice and firm, but not tooo rough. I cant get the pics to work here, but i have it on cardomain. http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/717932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
