|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,621
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,621 |
Originally posted by SVTCuervo:
Avg Lowering:
1.4" for the Front
1.3" for the Rear
The difference between my current Eibachs and the proposed H&Rs is 0.2 of an inch - I don't think it's gonna be significantly noticeable. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 86
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 86 |
Originally posted by Swazo:
1. Swazo
2. SVT4STV 
3.tour96se(current setup toooo low  )
4.TMoose02
5.wa2tuff (as long as I know my car will be lower than it is now)
6. foldthecorners
7. LoganB
8. DCL
9.
10.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,882
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,882 |
almost there.....do i need to buy two sets?!? 
Originally posted by Tourgasm:
Sometimes you can mess up a word so bad that spell check doens't know what the hell you're talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,426
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,143
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,143 |
Originally posted by R_G:
Originally posted by SVTCuervo:
Avg Lowering:
1.4" for the Front
1.3" for the Rear
The difference between my current Eibachs and the proposed H&Rs is 0.2 of an inch - I don't think it's gonna be significantly noticeable.
I could've sworn that H&R's were like
1.3"F 1.0"R
Guess I am wrong though...I do remember SOME people keeping Eibach rears and using H&R fronts because the rear sat too high for their taste.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,426
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,426 |
Originally posted by ZetecNinja:
I could've sworn that H&R's were like
1.3"F 1.0"R
Guess I am wrong though...I do remember SOME people keeping Eibach rears and using H&R fronts because the rear sat too high for their taste.
That's what I'm gonna do.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,621
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,621 |
Originally posted by wa2tuff:
Originally posted by ZetecNinja:
I could've sworn that H&R's were like
1.3"F 1.0"R
Guess I am wrong though...I do remember SOME people keeping Eibach rears and using H&R fronts because the rear sat too high for their taste.
That's what I'm gonna do.
OK, OK
1. Swazo
2. SVT4STV
3.tour96se(current setup toooo low )
4.TMoose02
5.wa2tuff (as long as I know my car will be lower than it is now)
6. foldthecorners
7. LoganB
8. DCL
9. RG
10.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 297
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 297 |
Originally posted by R_G:
1. Swazo
2. SVT4STV
3.tour96se(current setup toooo low )
4.TMoose02
5.wa2tuff (as long as I know my car will be lower than it is now)
6. foldthecorners
7. LoganB
8. DCL
9. RG
10.DDV
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 837
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 837 |
What about shipping to Canada?
CSVT
Feels Like Heaven
Goes Like Hell
Profile
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,882
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,882 |
Originally posted by Bridge:
What about shipping to Canada?
too late!  but i got a set of SVT springs i'll sell ya. 
Originally posted by Tourgasm:
Sometimes you can mess up a word so bad that spell check doens't know what the hell you're talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
