Originally posted by Davo:
Okay, okay you got me. So it led to the apprehension of a terrorist, but there is no proof that it saved the bridge. Let's get rid of the Patriot Act!! 
???? I thought the article proved nothing about the arrest.
Originally posted by Mysti-ken:
Unfortunately this particular article does not constitute proof of the value of the Patriot Act in apprehending Faris, as it doesn't discuss at all any of the elements of the investigation that led up to his arrest.
Originally posted by Mysti-ken:
It doesn't appear the bridge was in danger because they decided not to attack it before he was arrested.
... they decided not to attack before he was arrested because it wasn't going to work technically ... there was no attack planned on the bridge.
Last edited by Mysti-ken; 11/12/04 06:23 PM.
