|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 76
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 76 |
Whats the differences in these 3 years of the Contours?? I heard the 98 is bad.. WHY??
Thank You
1995 Contour SE MTX
Stock For Now 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 853
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 853 |
search you will learn a lot of great info..
98.5 Black SVT with 34k miles Build #5683 Born on 4\15\1998
WR Headers GMK CAI
Blaupunkt system fiberglass tweeter pods
L.E.D. tail lights in the works
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,431
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,431 |
Almost everyone will tell you that the one they own is the best year for SVTs.
I personally like E0s for their rims and lack of dash warp (and a few small things like dash clock and raised window switches only found in the 98 year).
Each year has its advantages and disadvantages; echoing BlackE1, searching yields info.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,887
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,887 |
all 3 years are bad......they're high maintenance cars...just like women 
06 GMC Sierra 2500HD Dmax/ally
06 Pontiac G6 GT
05 CRF250R
FOR SALE 06 KX65 with riding gear $2700 obo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779 |
Originally posted by Thinkmoto:
all 3 years are bad......they're high maintenance cars...just like women
In general, Contours made 1995-2000 suck. 
99 SVTC, T-Red, #652/2760-12.8.1998
Mother#@%@!* did I sound abstract?
I hope it sounded more confusin than that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
