There is an undisputed link between Cheney and Haliburton that Cheney does not dispute(former CEO, former major shareholder, current friends and associates in power there) - a company that is benefiting greatly from a war effort in which Cheney is a key player. This provides the reason for alleging that Cheney had a role in this - one that at face value seems to be a logical question to ask.
However, there has yet to be any legal determination that there were any misdeeds on Haliburton's part, which would make any link to Cheney moot.
Should these allegations against Haliburton be proven true, that still does not prove any culpability on Cheney's part, although investigating that (assuming evidence) could possibly be a next step.
If your convictions allow you to essentially make a determination before all the evidence is heard, solely on the basis of your political beliefs, so be it; my position, is that we are far from anyplace close to a)proving Haliburton did anything wrong, and b) if they did, that Cheney had something to do with it.
That would appear to be consistent with the finest traditions of the American justice system; which apparently you believe to be full of "muddy water."
