then so be it. bypass the UN security counsel for fear of it being compromised. i can agree to disagree with you and jato on that one.
that still doesn't put to rest the apparent deceit in the bush admin's handling of evidence/support for pre-emptive strike. if you also share the same opinion as jato that the case for pre-emptive strike was strong enough without the additional make-up (which i don't think it was) then why try to dress it up with questionable/false/unreliable evidence?
