I don't live in Canada, so I don't know how you define an "error in reasoning" there. But here in the U.S., it means "illogical reasoning." In other words, it means drawing an irrational conclusion from a stated premise (for example, saying "All the short people I have met are mean. Therefore, all short people are mean."). "Error in reasoning" does not mean using "loaded language," or disagreeing with YOUR point of view. After reading your last post, I see you did not provide any examples of illogical reasoning from my posts. Every statement I have made follows logically from the premises I have stated. Want to try again to find an illogical statement in my posts?
It looks like you took a Rhetoric Theory class, but you didn't quiet understand the material.
Here on CEG you are welcome to opine on the election and the American electoral process. You are not welcome to highjack the thread that Rex started. We were discussing the topic of Bush's performance in the war on terror. We covered a number of meaningful points, and there are many left to cover. You have now steered us into a different topic: the quality of discourse in the American electoral process. Please start a different thread if you want to discuss that topic.
