Originally posted by myfastse: I have asked this question before and got not answer. If we found one WMD would you guys vote for Bush?
that wouldn't make much of a difference to me. mainly because finding one WMD still wouldn't substantiate bush's claim that iraq had stockpiled WMDs, was developing nukes, had ties with bin laden, and was an imminent threat.
no matter how you slice it or who team bush tries to blame it on, the fact is bush stated evidence that they most likely knew was weak (or false) to support the war they wanted. i just don't trust bush to tell it like it is, maybe it's cheney's fault and rumsfeld too. but they answer to bush and ultimately he's responsible for their screwups. the way this thing has been handled i feel that at every turn bush just may twist and spin whatever 'evidence' he has to gain whatever support he needs for his admin's agenda.
