I truely despise arguing like this over the internet. Especially when the
's are brought out.
So we have decided we both don't have attitudes, while getting them trying to explain we don't have one. Way to go team.
I'd say we're losing.
About the "bigger car" statement, I can retract that if you wish, I was merely making a statement based on my view of engine size/car relationship, which is formed due to the norms, bigger cars tend to have bigger motors. Nothing affecting output usually, just a direct size relationship. I will go on an extreme and say imagine an Escalade with a a 2.0 I4 turbo pushing 350hp. Then imagine a CRX with a 5.7 V8 pushing 150hp. That's all I'm saying.Imagine opening the hood of the Mazda 6 and seeing an engine bay that can accomodate a V6, but in the center is a lonely 2.3 I4. I would just imagine it to look funny. Sort of like the 250cid I6 that used to be in my Nova. It just looks funny. I swear there was room to put another I6 next to it in that engine bay. Are we on the same page now?
The only reason I made the comment was that you are known to be a very opinionated and stubborn person who tends to pick fights. I think even you can agree with that one as IIRC you even mentioned something to that degree in a post. Yet, strangely, as much as I despise your way of thinking and what not, I see a hint of hope there and wish you'd lighten up for the most part.
