I had them Eibach installed like a year ago. Since then I tried my best to see the ground effects but failed to do so. First ppl told me it were gonna take some time for them springs to settle down so to say, then they told me that w/o them skirts no dropped looks were possible, so I put them skirts on, then Kremi came up with the notion that Zetecs were never gonna look really low b/c of the much lighter engine compared to Duratecs... Anyways, the car still doesn't look dropped to me.
What's your opinion about it? Also, what other springs are gonna lower the car better? Intrax? Are there any downside effects of lowering a car more?
You got 17s right? With the 17s your car won't look dropped.
Hector
2003 Rally Red Mitsubishi Evolution VIII
257HP/259TQ
2005 Lapis Blue Mazda 6s
RET: 00 Cabernet Red Ford Contour Zetec ATX SUPERCHARGED
160HP/141TQ
Originally posted by R_G: But with the other ppl's rides that got 17's - and they still look dropped...
Yours looks dropped.....look at the wheel gap(there is very little).
Hector
2003 Rally Red Mitsubishi Evolution VIII
257HP/259TQ
2005 Lapis Blue Mazda 6s
RET: 00 Cabernet Red Ford Contour Zetec ATX SUPERCHARGED
160HP/141TQ
Are you sure those aren't 215s? My 215/45s sit the same way in the back as yours, just a little more gap up front, maybe. But yes, overall, Eibachs are a good drop on an SVT. The car sits level and looks good, but up close you can see the difference between the wheel gaps and it's kind of annoying.
99 SVTC, T-Red, #652/2760-12.8.1998
Mother#@%@!* did I sound abstract?
I hope it sounded more confusin than that!