|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
Originally posted by todras:
That's not a Contour. 
Slap a T-66 on a contour, and youll get the same result. 
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
OP
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
why not? Harolds turbo Maxima puts down high 400 wheel hp on his stock motor with pump gas.
He's been through quite a few engines though.
Like I said someone is bound to do it to the Duratec sooner or later and find it's limits. 
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
yes, hes been through quite a few engines. (6 iirc) Mostly because of his own insanity though lol. I mean, who runs 15 psi and 150 shot on nitrous without any tune at all? That motor lasted 18 hours after installing it. He just replaced the motor he had a couple weeks ago with a used one because the waterpump was bad LMAO!  Apparentely, its easier to just install a new engine than to install a new waterpump according to him. This new stock motor with about 11.9:1 air/fuel tune has already seen 23 psi with a T-66 and its still holding together nicely. Im sure those Nissan motors are built better no doubt.
btw, last weekend he ran a new best of 11.9 @ 125! 
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
I have no life
|
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197 |
  FWD too.
-'96 SE MTX 3L
-'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535
-'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride
-Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 10,015
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 10,015 |
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
yes, hes been through quite a few engines. (6 iirc) Mostly because of his own insanity though lol. I mean, who runs 15 psi and 150 shot on nitrous without any tune at all? That motor lasted 18 hours after installing it. He just replaced the motor he had a couple weeks ago with a used one because the waterpump was bad LMAO! Apparentely, its easier to just install a new engine than to install a new waterpump according to him. This new stock motor with about 11.9:1 air/fuel tune has already seen 23 psi with a T-66 and its still holding together nicely. Im sure those Nissan motors are built better no doubt.
btw, last weekend he ran a new best of 11.9 @ 125!
Jesus that's a fast Maxima!
2000 SVT Turbo 295hp/269ftlb@12psi
#1 for Bendix Brakes Kits!
Knuckles rebuilt w/new bearings $55
AUSSIE ENDLINKS $70
Gutted pre-cats $80/set
A lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Originally posted by SAV-ZX2:
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by SAV-ZX2:
Definitely.
You don't get 400 horsepower by just a simple turbocharger.
That all depends.
Certainly just bolting on a turbo can give 400 HP. That's an easy given.
However if the stock pistons & rods can handle it is another question altogether now. "To date" we know 330ish is safe with a good tune.
Eventually we'll know their "true" safe limits.
Still 330 wheels from a small V6 is impressive for OEM parts designed for general NA applications.
Ok ok Master Demon.
You don't get 400 horsepower for very long by way of just a turbocharger. 
I'll agree though. 330 at the wheels is damn impressive for a V6.
Why not? Mine has been doing it for going on 10 months now on pump gas. I take that back, I detuned it to 315 wheels when I left. 
330 wheels is pretty close to 400 HP at the crank. I'm very confident that with pump gas it will run 350 wheels all day long.
The part that you can be concerned with for the stopckl pistons is that they can sustain 330 Ft-lbs of torque on pump gas!!!
The rods can handle higher rpms, at least 8K. The turbo motor can actually reduce some of the stress of high-torque tensile loads that will break a rod if it were in a NA motor with the same load.
Will the pistons handle 400 wHP on pump gas and high rpm??? I don't know but I'm guessing it doesn't take 330 ft-lbs at 7000 rpm to make 400 wHP. IT is definitely possible.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,840
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,840 |
[sigh] I just need to shut up. 
Troll. 1997 VW Jetta MkIII GLS 5spd
All hail my appearance on CEG!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 333
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 333 |
hey man, thats awsome, but you droped your torque (like it matters)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
Originally posted by Augi:
hey man, thats awsome, but you droped your torque (like it matters)
umm...doesnt every dyno graph. 
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 718
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 718 |
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
Originally posted by Augi:
hey man, thats awsome, but you droped your torque (like it matters)
umm...doesnt every dyno graph.
genius
1999 Cougar V6 MTX
SVT UIM/LIM/65mm TB, I/H/E, Fidanza/SPEC III/Torsen, Koni/GC's, 19" Icon wheels w/ Pirelli rubber, NX Wet Kit
|
|
|
|
|
