Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
#107889 10/23/01 01:59 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,708
W
Moderator
Offline
Moderator
W
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,708
Porsche is not Ford... true, but the Duratec engine was developped by Porsche. laugh
Sorry just had to throw that in.
-Mark


You can do something for Love...
You can do something for Money...
But there is nothing quite so satisfying as doing something out of Spite.
GTExtreme1@aol.com
#107890 10/23/01 02:01 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,037
C
Administrator
Offline
Administrator
C
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,037
Quote:
Originally posted by svtnos:
im not an expert but my friend with a gn has one gn doing 9s. then he did a whole new setup. now he has a twin turbo gn. he did a 8.xx in the 1/4 and should be breaking into the 7s within the next couple weeks of tuning and wat not... i have a couple other friends with twin turbo v8s and they are doing 9s and daily drivers. i heard both that either on or the other is better... i wouldnt mind seeing 1 or 2 on a contour...



You're dealing with larger displacement on those engines. That means you need to be able to deal with more exhaust gases andstill be able to push more air into the engine (granted not as high RPM's because it's a pushrod). It's more effecient to put two midsized turbos on a larger engine, unless you can get a good midsized VATN turbo. Most builders don't care or don't know about VATN. Most race car engine builders don't care because it's going to be run at WOT the entire time, anyway. VATN is great for a daily driver, and the occasional jaunt to the track. But, they are a little more expensive, and you'd be hard pressed to find one on eBay. :p


-Chris Hightower-
-Hightower Performance Products, LLC

(Oo.«xx».oO)
o xxxxxxxxx o
#107891 10/23/01 03:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,527
R
Administrator
Offline
Administrator
R
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,527
peak power and power under the curve and curve shape are dramatically different.

CV6MTX, you seem to be hung up on peak power, which is fine for a car that will spend its life on the drag strip. Power under the curve, and curve shape are far more important to a street or road course driven car. Also, for a single turbo to make good power, the efficiency must be max at near redline for the large peak power. but on a twin turbo, the efficiency peak can be brought down a bit for better use of the efficiency of the twins, and still be capable of the same peak power levels. Aftermarket people like single because it is typically easier to set up to make peak power. Not saying a single turbo is never good, far from it, but you imply that there is never a good reason for a twin turbo, and that is just plain ignorant, stubborn and blind. I re-iterate that it really depends on the application and hardware being considered more than any general rule between single and twin turbo's.


It's all about balance.

bcphillips@peoplepc.com
#107892 10/23/01 03:47 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 81
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 81
Forget it...it's not worth my time to continue...


1995 Probe GT ATX TOO MANY MODS
1999 Cougar V6 MTX
Stage 1: (Basic Mods)B&M STS, Bassani Exhaust, KKM intake w/ weapon R pipe, ProFlow 75mm MAF w/optimiser, YoDude Y-pipe w/hi flow cat, SVT TB, SVT Upper IM, OMP FSTB,AF gauge, Aerogear fiberglass hood (completed)
Stage 2: (Top End Work) 19-24lb injectors, P&P heads w larger valves and HPC coated, P&P and port matched lower intake manifold also HPC coated, custom ground cams, Ford Racing 9mm wires, Bosch +4 plugs, Custom burned PAC or Diablo chip (will dyno with both), Apexi SAFC (In Progress)
Stage 3: (Transmission) Quaife LSD, CM stage 3 Clutch, Fidanza flywheel (In progress)
Stage 4: (Suspension)Koni adjustibles, H&R springs, Progress 21mm rear anti sway bar (Installing on Tues)
Current dyno: 172.9 whp with just bolt ons and stock exhaust manifolds (not gutted), oh, and bad wires smile...
#107893 10/23/01 04:54 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,173
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,173
(cough) PMS... (Ahem)


Sal Khan

'00 Silver SVT - KKM, SMA Torque brace.

'00.5 Aprilia RSV Mille - Renegade 2-2 Exhaust, Renegade Air Kit, lots of chips, Evoluzione Ignition Amp, 44t Rear Sprocket

Want to see what I did for lunch today? Check out http://www.mindspring.com/~salk/Lunch/LunchJournal.html !!!
#107894 10/23/01 05:03 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,042
J
JVT Offline
Moderator
Offline
Moderator
J
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,042
Quote:
Originally posted by SalKhan:
(cough) PMS... (Ahem)


Hahaha, no kidding. I was about to say that.

John


'98 SVT - modded
-15.01@91.8
'95 Suzuki GS500E
-faster than the above
---wanting a Speed Triple or Superhawk badly
#107895 10/23/01 06:43 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,037
C
Administrator
Offline
Administrator
C
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,037
Twin Sequential Turbos= Use two low tech turbos with different A/R's to reduce turbo lag: One works good down low, and the other one up top. Low tech is usually cheaper and "Twin Turbo" sounds really cool. ---See RX7, Supra, 300ZX.

Once you understand that, you might have a chance at seeing why a VATN turbo is better than twin low-tech turbos.

VATN Turbo= One turbo that acts like two. Vanes close down at low exhaust gas volume (low RPM's) to spool it up (like Porsche). Once the volume of the exhuast gases go up, the vanes open to allow the gases to flow by, still spinning the turbine.
---See Mercedes, Mopar, Audi, BMW

Corkey Bell has a neat book out. Sounds like someone needs a new "engine builder" and needs to realize there might be a better way of doing things.


-Chris Hightower-
-Hightower Performance Products, LLC

(Oo.«xx».oO)
o xxxxxxxxx o
#107896 10/23/01 07:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,329
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally posted by Chris Hightower:
Corkey Bell has a neat book out. Sounds like someone needs a new "engine builder" and needs to realize there might be a better way of doing things.


Ding, ding, ding...

...and We have a winner... laugh


2000 SVT #674 - Check it out!

Whoever coined the phrase; "If it ain't broke; don't fix it" ~ Just doesn't get it...
#107897 10/23/01 08:03 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 81
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 81
BTW...your wonderful VATN turbo...you speak of it as if it's great, but how come all I keep hearing about them is they are very limited in power making ability, and they break very often. Also, have a short live even if taken care of...sounds wonderful

Oh well...I'll leave quietly. Cause i's worthless to continue. If you care I used to work for BMW, so my car knowledge is not short lived. My engine builder is a Ford Engineer I met. So, before you start saying things, think first please. That's all I ask.

Enjoy...good luck to everyone...I thought we were all people with the same hobbies, I guess not.

Oh if you care come visit me on the cougar board under the name PGTATX...

Hey Demon and Chris hightower...I guess my name fools you...Check fastcougar.com, and you may remember who I am...just check the special section


1995 Probe GT ATX TOO MANY MODS
1999 Cougar V6 MTX
Stage 1: (Basic Mods)B&M STS, Bassani Exhaust, KKM intake w/ weapon R pipe, ProFlow 75mm MAF w/optimiser, YoDude Y-pipe w/hi flow cat, SVT TB, SVT Upper IM, OMP FSTB,AF gauge, Aerogear fiberglass hood (completed)
Stage 2: (Top End Work) 19-24lb injectors, P&P heads w larger valves and HPC coated, P&P and port matched lower intake manifold also HPC coated, custom ground cams, Ford Racing 9mm wires, Bosch +4 plugs, Custom burned PAC or Diablo chip (will dyno with both), Apexi SAFC (In Progress)
Stage 3: (Transmission) Quaife LSD, CM stage 3 Clutch, Fidanza flywheel (In progress)
Stage 4: (Suspension)Koni adjustibles, H&R springs, Progress 21mm rear anti sway bar (Installing on Tues)
Current dyno: 172.9 whp with just bolt ons and stock exhaust manifolds (not gutted), oh, and bad wires smile...
#107898 10/23/01 08:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,527
R
Administrator
Offline
Administrator
R
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,527
CV6MTX,

I have no doubt that you are knowledgable, my only problem is the blanket statement that twin turbos is never better than a single. Both setups have thier merits and the particular application, its intended use, and the hardware available should be considered, without blindly choosing one setup or the other.

fwiw, there are at least several present and past Ford engineers here, including at least one from SVT Engineering (formerly SVE) as well as several more from Ford's suppliers.


It's all about balance.

bcphillips@peoplepc.com
Page 3 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Moderated by  GTO Pete 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5