you guys should just admit/accept it already, the evidence didn't support the claims (imminent threat, wmds, nukes, bin laden) back then and what we've learned recently only confirms it. imo the bush admin wanted regime change in iraq (conservatives will swear it was justified because the world is safer without saddam
) and had no qualms about mis-representing the evidence to achieve it. i can accept that, but then to fcuk it up and allow it to get out of hand just added insult to injury.
maybe his intentions are good but bush has been a sub-par cic. i don't consider him the strongest link on his staff and i can't trust that he's the one running the show.
