Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,096
R
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
R
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,096
Originally posted by sigma:
Quote:

Statistically, people over 75 get into as many accidents as teenagers. Yet they get reduced insurance and frequently reduced rental car rates...




Actually numerous studies have all reached the conclusion that people over the age of 65 get into more accidents than those under the age of 25. And, on top of that, because of their age, the accidents they cause have greater chance of injury and significantly greater chance of a fatality.

So, the reason young people pay high rates isn't entirely because of their liklihood of getting into an accident -- it's to subsidize the older people. You'll notice that as the population as gotten older the gap between 'normal' rates and 'teenage' rates has gotten bigger and bigger. While cars have gotten more expensive to repair, 'teenage' rates have still risen at a rate far exceeding 'normal' rates even while their rate of getting into an accident hasn't significantly changed.

On the same note, female teenage drivers still pay less than male teenage drivers even though studies have shown that they cause more accidents. While 25 years ago they did not, as the prevalence towards bad habits while driving has increased (drinking coffee, applying make-up, cell-phones, etc) accidents caused by women have far eclipsed accidents caused by men. But they still pay less.





So why has there been no law suits for age descrimination??? Or any kind of descrimination for that matter.

Last edited by Red92784; 10/03/04 09:33 PM.

98 Contour SVT (soon to be reborn) 2000 GMC Envoy... Screw you guys, I like it. 89' Mustang 5.0 (Just bolt on's... for now)
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,639
H
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
H
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,639
to get back to the topic, if u cant find a rental car place, as some have said try to find a ford dealership that rents cars. most should have just a minimum of 18 years old


Hugo AIM:omegazodiac 95 gl & 99 contour svt #1750/2760 my profile pics stuff for sale
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,069
D
Hard-core CEG'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,069
Originally posted by hmouta:
to get back to the topic, if u cant find a rental car place, as some have said try to find a ford dealership that rents cars. most should have just a minimum of 18 years old




Yeah I think this is what Ill do if I go. Do they have any stipulations for your REASON for renting?

Joined: May 2000
Posts: 970
J
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
J
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 970
Originally posted by sigma:

.........
On the same note, female teenage drivers still pay less than male teenage drivers even though studies have shown that they cause more accidents. While 25 years ago they did not, as the prevalence towards bad habits while driving has increased (drinking coffee, applying make-up, cell-phones, etc) accidents caused by women have far eclipsed accidents caused by men. But they still pay less.




I'd like to see a link with stats for that. I'm not calling you a liar, I just think a link like that might come in handy the next time someone spews something to me about women drivers getting in fewer accidents...


98 GL sport (V6 MTX) The Durable Duratec? - (DMD, Metal impeller WaterPump, Synth & Stinky in the tranny)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220
S
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
S
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220
There are numerous sources for the statistics. I must first say that my wording is incorrect -- women do not cause "more" accidents than men, but they do cause more per mile driven.

The difficult part is finding those that are corrected by miles driven rather than by percentage of licenses. Men make up about 50% of licensed drivers but drive some 80% of the miles driven. Many groups correct their data incorrectly which leads to the incorrect conclusion that men are more at risk for accidents than women. While they are ahead by frequency they are not by rate. Meaning that if you and your wife drove the same distance to work everyday she would have a greater chance of being in an accident.

I just did a quick google for some but I'm not having much luck finding some that aren't corrected by license numbers. I've seen some in the past though. The one I really liked was from Wisconsin and was recent, but I'm not having any luck finding it today.



Note that this data is before the big cell phone boom which is blamed for an even higher increase in the accident rate among women.

Here's a link to a good, more recent study:
http://www.atsb.gov.au/road/pdf/cr177.pdf

One conclusion from that study is that women are up to 1.8 times as likely to be injured in an accident than men.

I believe this same study also goes into likelihood of single-vehicle accidents among men and women, which men are far liklier to have because of their tendency to speed and also drive drunk. If one were to remove single-vehicle accidents, which isn't even covered under the liability coverage that many teens have anyhow, the accident rates for teenage women would far exceed that of men.


2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX Webpage 2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,397
A
b0x @dm1n
Offline
b0x @dm1n
A
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,397
OK so let me get this straight. say we drive the same miles durring the week apart but I drive whenever we are together, meaning I drive more. Would theory suggest that it likely happens because she is in the car with me and distracting me either because of nagging or wearing a skirt.

LOL!

-Andy


Andy W. The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5