Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
#105976 10/08/01 12:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 999
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 999
Quote:
Originally posted by godzilia:
OCT 3, 2001 9:10 PM

R/T .884
60' 2.364
330 6.204
1/8 9.389
MPH 76.57
1000 12.134
1/4 14.442
MPH 95.89

My personal best.



I am not trying to call you out on this or start anything, but I compared your times to a buddy`s of mine timeslip and the times are almost identical. But the thing is, he was driving a 95 cobra with the 5.0 with K&N and a Borla cat back on it... :rolleyes:
I am just saying that by your times, it looks a little weird. After this Friday, I will be able to post my times and I will compare it to yours.


14.72@ 92.6 mph
www.modularV8.com

"CLUTCH KILLER" and also recently known as the DRIVETRAIN KILLER
#105977 10/08/01 04:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 331
X
Member
Offline
Member
X
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 331
I havent run at the quarter mile but I was wondering if anyone with a 98 or newer SE V6 has run. Or what do you think expected times could be. With small mods cold air induction,removed one cat and resonator and added magnaflow stainless exhaust.


The Stealth Mobile.
#105978 10/08/01 09:59 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 156
G
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally posted by svt2000:



I am not trying to call you out on this or start anything, but I compared your times to a buddy`s of mine timeslip and the times are almost identical. But the thing is, he was driving a 95 cobra with the 5.0 with K&N and a Borla cat back on it... :rolleyes:
I am just saying that by your times, it looks a little weird. After this Friday, I will be able to post my times and I will compare it to yours.


Oh that's sad if he ran a 14.4 or some where around that with mods. A 95 GT runs low 15 to high 14's stock. and a cobra runs what mid to low 14's stock then? It should. He should get better times with a cobra with mods maybe low 14's high 13's? a 95 Cobra with mods that he has should run 13's. What were your 60' MPH and stuff with your 14.7 run?


2000 SVT Contour Silver

IN Process "3.0L w/Turbo"

Born In Kansas on 12/16/99
Engine Died on 6/18/2002 18,223 still at Ford as of 7/5/02

#986 of 2150
#105979 10/08/01 10:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,329
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,329
godzilla. If one of your secret mods is not Nitrous. You are completely full of crap... And that's putting it mildly...


2000 SVT #674 - Check it out!

Whoever coined the phrase; "If it ain't broke; don't fix it" ~ Just doesn't get it...
#105980 10/08/01 10:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 392
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 392
Quote:
Originally posted by godzilia:


Oh that's sad if he ran a 14.4 or some where around that with mods. A 95 GT runs low 15 to high 14's stock. and a cobra runs what mid to low 14's stock then? It should. He should get better times with a cobra with mods maybe low 14's high 13's? a 95 Cobra with mods that he has should run 13's. What were your 60' MPH and stuff with your 14.7 run?


Whats sad is you making assumptions about the times on this cobra without knowing where and in what conditions he ran. 14.4 is not that bad for that year Cobra, your talking like the car has gears. While we are making assumptions, unless your running N20, I would say you ran your car downhill in an indoor freezer room filled with wannabee denstists...
:rolleyes: eek laugh


Bill P. 01' LG S2, LG CSVT Wheels, GC's,
FI Hood, 3L Duratec Hybrid patiently waiting
Innovative Performance Technology
SE-CEG Member, SEFEC Moderator
To join the South Eastern Ford Enthusiast Club
email me here at SVT065g@cs.com
#105981 10/09/01 01:21 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,329
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally posted by SVT 065 G:

I would say you ran your car downhill in an indoor freezer room filled with wannabee denstists...
:rolleyes: eek laugh


I wanna be a dentist. I have a knack... For causing things pain... laugh


2000 SVT #674 - Check it out!

Whoever coined the phrase; "If it ain't broke; don't fix it" ~ Just doesn't get it...
#105982 10/09/01 03:13 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
Quote:
Originally posted by godzilia:


Oh that's sad if he ran a 14.4 or some where around that with mods. A 95 GT runs low 15 to high 14's stock. and a cobra runs what mid to low 14's stock then? It should. He should get better times with a cobra with mods maybe low 14's high 13's? a 95 Cobra with mods that he has should run 13's. What were your 60' MPH and stuff with your 14.7 run?



since when does a borla and a k&n drop 1/2 second+ off your et? maybe .1, if you are lucky. sorry bolt ons just don't add up to huge gains like that... not unless you have alot of them, and a lot of luck, and a tuned car. then i could see removing a 1/2 or so from your et. also depends on the car... but i know a borla and a k&n are not going to put a 95 cobra in the 13s...


i am offically a troll... so take my information and advice with a grain of salt.

08/15/2001 - 11/05/2001 : 1999 Ford Contour SVT : 170fwhp - 147.9 fwtq
07/17/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Roush Mustang GT Stage 1
11/05/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
#105983 10/09/01 01:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 167
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 167
Geez, aren't everyone making assumptions about that cobras without even knowing the details? laugh

Anyway, here is the detail on the cobra. It's a 95 cobra with off road h-pipe, dynomax mufflers(weld in) and k/n filter; that's a little different than marc posted. Sorry, bro.

The time was ran at Milan Dragway (a.k.a ice rink) and it was his FIRST TIME at the track. His 60' was around 2.35-2.45 on stock Goodyear GS-C(pos). Also that car was not running properly at the time, the car would backfire once past 4500 rpm. We later found that the MAF was covered with k/n filter oil which caused the backfiring. Too bad he never took it to the track again since he sold it couple months later.

Here is an example on how that car should've performed when running right; I have a 98 cobra that was running 13.5@104 at the time and I could not pull on him until top of 2nd gear and will only pull 3-4 car lengths on him up to 100-110 mph. So the 95 cobra in doubt could very well got in the high 13s but never got a chance to do so.

But what I don't understand is that why did this tread get turned around to a 95 cobra's time? Weren't we talking about certain someone's quarter mile time with some "secret" wink mods? In fact, he still hasn't even respond to whether he is NA or not. Till he respond, I would take his comment with a grain of salt.

Btw, Marc's 60' was 2.1 for that 14.7 run and for you to pull high 2.3 60' and still get 14.4 out of the run will require up to 200 FWHP to do so. It's just the law of physics. Later.


98 cobra
12.60@108.06 NA
12.38@113.07 75 shot
#105984 10/09/01 01:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 999
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 999
Quote:
Originally posted by tcobra98:
Geez, aren't everyone making assumptions about that cobras without even knowing the details? laugh

Anyway, here is the detail on the cobra. It's a 95 cobra with off road h-pipe, dynomax mufflers(weld in) and k/n filter; that's a little different than marc posted. Sorry, bro.

The time was ran at Milan Dragway (a.k.a ice rink) and it was his FIRST TIME at the track. His 60' was around 2.35-2.45 on stock Goodyear GS-C(pos). Also that car was not running properly at the time, the car would backfire once past 4500 rpm. We later found that the MAF was covered with k/n filter oil which caused the backfiring. Too bad he never took it to the track again since he sold it couple months later.

Here is an example on how that car should've performed when running right; I have a 98 cobra that was running 13.5@104 at the time and I could not pull on him until top of 2nd gear and will only pull 3-4 car lengths on him up to 100-110 mph. So the 95 cobra in doubt could very well got in the high 13s but never got a chance to do so.

But what I don't understand is that why did this tread get turned around to a 95 cobra's time? Weren't we talking about certain someone's quarter mile time with some "secret" wink mods? In fact, he still hasn't even respond to whether he is NA or not. Till he respond, I would take his comment with a grain of salt.

Btw, Marc's 60' was 2.1 for that 14.7 run and for you to pull high 2.3 60' and still get 14.4 out of the run will require up to 200 FWHP to do so. It's just the law of physics. Later.



Thanks for the info and backup. I am not trying to say that I am a good driver or the best, but I am saying that I can drive my car. When I first took the car to the track last year, I was running what the mags said about the car. 15.5 @88. In time and after lots of practicing, I was able to drop to low 15`s. I know how to launch my car and the right rpm, I also know where and how to shift. All I am saying is that, your times are close to and even identical to a my buddy`s cobra. Now if you want, feel free to come to Norwalk on Friday and watch me run. But I will post the slip so you can see. If you still don`t beleive me, click on the link in my sig, and watch my run... wink

Marc


14.72@ 92.6 mph
www.modularV8.com

"CLUTCH KILLER" and also recently known as the DRIVETRAIN KILLER
Page 7 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  GTO Pete 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5