|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8 |
Originally posted by JVT:
Didn't know it was possible for someone to even believe that.
:p
JohnYeah that is wacky stuff, what did you have besides the N20 and the SC - a sh/tload of stickers on your quarter panel ?!!! ***I guess that the acheivement is to be low 14's to high 13's with the N20 and SC then ? Later
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 392
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 392 |
Originally posted by svt2000:
All my stuff is bolt on Hopefully next week, I should be able to get to mid maybe even low 14`s. But I am still waiting for a few things to arrive :p All N/A stuff that is...im sure you can do it, especially with those 2.1 sec 60' you were cutting...what i would have given for one of those!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,042
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,042 |
Originally posted by SVT 065 G:
im sure you can do it, especially with those 2.1 sec 60' you were cutting...what i would have given for one of those! Yeah, I've been praying for one of those for a while, can't seem to go my way. My best run netted a 2.32 60'.  That was, of course, with beg-for-grip VR4s, worn clutch and 36psi. Now, UR Stage 1 clutch, Quaife, and KDWs.  There better be an improvement, low 2.2s at least. Must....get...headers... John
'98 SVT - modded
-15.01@91.8
'95 Suzuki GS500E
-faster than the above
---wanting a Speed Triple or Superhawk badly
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 392
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 392 |
Originally posted by JVT:
Yeah, I've been praying for one of those for a while, can't seem to go my way.
My best run netted a 2.32 60'.
That was, of course, with beg-for-grip VR4s, worn clutch and 36psi.
Now, UR Stage 1 clutch, Quaife, and KDWs. There better be an improvement, low 2.2s at least.
Must....get...headers...
JohnJohn all that should help tremendously, EXCEPT maybe the kdw's, I found the sidewall on the kdw's is so darn stiff, I can get just about any other z-rated tire to hook better than the bfg's. Of course, yours should be an improvement since you had no tread...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9 |
3.0 and SC
1/4-13.3
13.9
13.25
Enough said.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,042
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,042 |
Originally posted by JboYSVT:
3.0 and SC
1/4-13.3
13.9
13.25
Enough said. Got pics? Enough said. John
'98 SVT - modded
-15.01@91.8
'95 Suzuki GS500E
-faster than the above
---wanting a Speed Triple or Superhawk badly
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,225
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,225 |
Originally posted by JVT:
Got pics?
Enough said.
John ROTFLMAO! Well put I would also like to see pictures of your 3.0 and SC...
Ryan
Latest Mod: Mirko Splitter
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,225
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,225 |
Originally posted by JboYSVT:
3.0 and SC
1/4-13.3
13.9
13.25
Enough said. The more I think about it, the more weak those numbers are....assuming you were running this setup :rolleyes: IIRC Mark(Worldtour) said he could run mid to low 13's with his SC....if you add a 3.0 to that equation you should at least better that number by .3 to .4(at least) simply due to the extra torque off the line. With a quaiffe, clutch, good tires, and maybe a bulldog box I don't see why you couldn't potentially pull off 13 flat or 12's!!!!. Now that sounds fun, hmmm.... I have to stop talking about fast cars, it's making me depressed knowing that I have to wait till this summer for the 3.0, and dreams of a SC/TC are way off in the future
Ryan
Latest Mod: Mirko Splitter
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682 |
Originally posted by Krafty:
The more I think about it, the more weak those numbers are....assuming you were running this setup :rolleyes:
IIRC Mark(Worldtour) said he could run mid to low 13's with his SC....if you add a 3.0 to that equation you should at least better that number by .3 to .4(at least) simply due to the extra torque off the line. With a quaiffe, clutch, good tires, and maybe a bulldog box I don't see why you couldn't potentially pull off 13 flat or [b]12's!!!!. Now that sounds fun, hmmm.... I have to stop talking about fast cars, it's making me depressed knowing that I have to wait till this summer for the 3.0, and dreams of a SC/TC are way off in the future [/b] yeah right. first you would HAVE to lower compression to get the s/c on the 3.0 conversion. also, mark does not have track times... mearly g-tech and some speculation. the only s/c tour i saw at the track was pulling mid 14s. with the added torque of the 3.0 you could probably get into the 13s, maybe mid to lows if you are good.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 156
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 156 |
OCT 3, 2001 9:10 PM
R/T .884
60' 2.364
330 6.204
1/8 9.389
MPH 76.57
1000 12.134
1/4 14.442
MPH 95.89
My personal best.
2000 SVT Contour Silver
IN Process "3.0L w/Turbo"
Born In Kansas on 12/16/99
Engine Died on 6/18/2002 18,223 still at Ford as of 7/5/02
#986 of 2150
|
|
|
|
|
