Originally posted by Davo:
Originally posted by PlatoSVT:
I have a friend who thinks a homosexual man is equivalent to a dog. Is this still any resemblance of a free country??


I'm all for state recognition of gay marriages (civil unions). But not social recognition of them (marriage). That's something that has to be guarded to protect the sanctity of the oldest, simplest, and most important human social institution. That homosexuals invest their entire relevance in being part of a heterosexual institution amazes me.

Originally posted by LinaBby:
Honestly If your not hurting anything or anybody DO WHATEVER YOU WANT.. Glad i came back to boards! Are you married davo do you have kids? If You are married does your marriage mean less now that gay people can get married? What if your son or daughter was homosexual???



The first statement there says alot.

No spouse, no kids. A marriage "meaning less" is not my point here. If I had a gay son or daughter I would be sure to advise them that the only way for their relationship with their partner to be relevant is not through their assimilation with heterosexual institutions.

I shouldn't hate bait so late.



Did anything in the subject of THIS thread contain me talking about homosexuality?? or gay marriage??

I think your just out to start SH!T.. I dont believe in incest but especially in people who choose to do it to procreate... Considering there could be serious birth defects in their child... Who are you to say they shouldnt get married? Not like marriage means a whole lot in our society anymore... They even have a talk show for divorce... Why dont you question everyones right to get married?

tired of the bs