Originally posted by JaTo:
Second, if you could get a group of them to vote, I believe the vast majority would vote Kerry, due to the perception that he would be weaker on taking the fight to them.



at the same time they could also vote for kerry because he might be more apt to work towards a genuine diplomatic solution to the problems which inspire terrorism. whereas bush is dead set on solving issues with war. just a different take on it...

personally i don't believe that terrorists want to continue to kill. but in their mislead minds they feel that it's their only means of fighting their battle and having their voice heard. and i'm by no means rationalizing or sympathizing with their brutal actions.

Originally posted by JaTo:
I hear a lot from the Kerry camp on what has went wrong in post-war Iraq, and a some of it VERY legitimate, though all I hear is deafening silence on the solutions to some of the screw-ups that have taken place. The current administration is maneuvering, albeit slowly, to respond to some of the realities that exist in Iraq now.




the solutions are fairly limited so there's not much new to be said there. i think what the kerry campaign is trying to get across (or what they should focus on) is they would be more competent in implementing the solutions and have fewer screw-ups.

'03 Saab 9-5 Aero