|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,562
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,562 |
Originally posted by scott_99: I agree, my 99 csvt could take my friends a4 quattro w/ 1 bar chip. Quattro is great for handling in traction-limited conditions, but its a piggie in the drags. (extra weight plus driveline loss).
Note that the new 1.8T has been factory updated with a faster spooling turbo, bigger injectors, larger manifold, variable cam timing, and drive by wire throttle.
Fastest 1.8T's seem to be the jetta and gti's, they have transverse engine layout(less driveline loss than the VW/AUDI longitudinal platform), lightest weight (2800 lbs I think, vs 3200-3300 for a passat, maybe 3500 for a A4 w/quattro).
Chip alone on a new 1.8t (AWW, AUG engine codes) is supposed to be 205-210 crank hp, and 245 ft/lbs.
low-mid 14's in the quarter, low 6's 0-60.
I believe this is where SVT 2 1.8T is operating at.....Would make an interesting race.
 Whoa mamma  , that's a ton better numbers than previous models. No use backing out now... Well, let's get it on!
Brad Noon '99 SE MTX 3 point oh my God H.O. 179HP/178TQ BNMotorsports Floormats, powder coating, TB optimizing, Gutted cats, etc BNMotorsports is now the preferred distributor of Contour/SVT/Mystique Indiglo style gauges!!!bnmotorsports@msn.com
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,248
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,248 |
Aaarrggg! The dyno plot tells the whole story. They have a 2001 1.8T with just chip & catback making 181 FWHP (near my 179 FWHP) but that cars 200 lb/ft down low makes the power curve VERY fat. For example, at 4000 RPM, I'm making about 110 HP to the 1.8Tws 140 HP (so he is killing me at that RPM), by 5000 RPM it is closer - only 10 HP apart. So to stay with that car, (assuming similar weight) I would need to keep above 5000 RPMs which means either: 1) a chip with 7500 RPM redline so that upon shifting I am at 5000 RPM instead of 4500, or 2) a 6 speed. Be nice to have that hipo damper and chip...
1999 Amazon Green SVT Contour (#554/2760)
Stock SVT Duratec V6 with:
Intake- K&N filter/75mm MAF meter
Exhaust- MSDS Y-pipe/Bassani catback
Durability-Ford "dual mode" damper, Mobil 1/K&N oil filter
179.2 FWHP at 6900 RPM
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,037
Administrator
|
|
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,037 |
Soon my friends. Very soon. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10 |
Originally posted by SVT 2 1.8T:
I sold the 98 SVT i have and have the turbo. Just for the record my chipped 1.8T will kill you guys in the straights but I long for the sure footedness and Ford power of my old SVT. The pisser of the whole 1.8T is that a good chip (Autothority) + Forge DV... (total cost anywhere from ($400 - $1k depending on the quality chip you get) put the Passat/Golf/Jetta/TT/A4 up to and past the SVT. (Go ahead and give me 1 star if that makes you feel better.) That's not to say that chipping will yield a long life for your clutch, turbo, or engine, but for low $ you've got a sleeper car. Now, an SVT with a turbo, that's a different story....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,090
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,090 |
Originally posted by Chris Hightower: Soon my friends. Very soon. not that i have the money to do both...but will the turbo being developed be able to bolt on to either the 2.5L or the 3.0L? or just the 2.5? thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,108
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,108 |
Originally posted by SVT 2 1.8T:
Just for the record my chipped 1.8T will kill you guys in the straights I don't know about that.SlimShaddy just Beat a chipped Audi 1.8T It also had Intake Mods His said his boost gauge was pushing 16PSI And he beat It.It was also automatic with 4 Wheel drive.
Kick Ass don't Kiss It
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,932
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,932 |
my friend Had (now has 97 supra turbo) 1.8t Audi A4 w/ quattro.. he had an exhaust, chip, and some air cleaner in it.. well, as Tazz would say, "Just anotha victum!" But i like those cars.. i honestly almost bought an 18.t A4 before my brother showed me the csvt. I was ready for the A4, I was looking for mods at total audi performance's site and everything.. but now, i have my love, the svt... wish i looked at a muscle stang insterad but hey...
99 svt contour
-its fast. period.
91 mustang gt
-its faster. period.
86 Buick Grand National
- its way faster, double period!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,631
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,631 |
Brad I will be there and if the 3.0 SE can't get him the Stang will Backing the Contour the whole way!!!
Merlin
281hp 324tq
Timing 14' FP 36,24lbs,190lph,75Maf,65tb,cobra upper&lower,B303, GT-40 Crate with X al heads, Mac shorties, Off Road H,2chamber Flow's dumped, Tokico 5wys, Hotichkis Ctrl Arms, Alum Drive shaft, 3.73, Sub Frame,Steeda Tri-Ax, 94 Seats Drivers side powered.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 503
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 503 |
*spooge* Oh Chris hurry with the turbo!
Hey then we can buy turbo or "T" badges. i'm thinkin the one off the Porshe. simple "turbo"
'99 Contour SE Sport, 50k, V-6, ATX, T-Red, With Many many mods.
'99 GMC Sonoma SLS, 16k, 4-cyl, Summit white, not as many mods.
Founder of Ghost Tech Racing inc.
AIM-FordMondeoS
"Time does not exist in this dimention; but in a time and a place we know not of..." -A. P. Stidwell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,037
Administrator
|
|
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,037 |
Originally posted by wonj:
not that i have the money to do both...but will the turbo being developed be able to bolt on to either the 2.5L or the 3.0L? or just the 2.5?
thanks! Since the blocks are the same, yes. I would get the 3L up and running before adding the turbo. I have had contact with people with this same question. We'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
