Originally posted by JaTo:
GM seems to either hit the ball out of the park on vehices or end up shoving the bat sideways up their posterior while swinging for that home run.

I've long since given up on second-guessing why the GM does some of the things they do. You would think a company that came up with the CTS-V and the Corvette would be able to reach some sort of product consistency...




Consistency is a factor in certain areas. In design it's not always the best answer. Those who break out of the mold will will always be faced with the options you've laid out. Add the Aztec to your CTS-V & 'Vette(validating your point)analogy. Consistancy in quality, reliability, service, perfomance (power and efficiency) and safety are, however, key.

Part of GM's past strategy, and consistancy shortcomings, has been hampered by leadership which can't quite make up it's mind. With 10 new cars coming in the next 20 months, and Lutz (a true "CAR GUY") giving direction, I think you'll see some improvement from #1.

Ford is in serious trouble. Surpassed by Toyota and bolstered only by strong truck segments, reforms are desperately needed. Engineering isn't the primary problem though. It's primarily design; which is what gets poeople into dealerships in the first place. When given freedom they can be great (Ford GT, new Mustang, F 150). Constant re-orgs and purchasing clashes (decisions over) with design along side marketing screw-ups are the trouble. The Ford 500 pales when compared to the Chrysler 300.

DCX is doing OK. The 300 has a Hemi, feels like a car half it's size and has Mercedes tranny and rear end. Even the interior is nice. That's right, the interior of a Chrysler in nice. The car has great proportions (long hood, short overhang, slab/big sides). It'll be interesting to see if they follow up with anything other than the Magnum that is as impressive. Somehow, with the Germans involved, I think they will.

Just some opinions here.

Semper Fi "They've got us surrounded. Poor bastards." -Chesty