BP, do you really believe calling people "babies" will change the facts of this matter, or are you just another fool blinded by hatred? If so, I pity you.
I certainly do not support 100% of what Bush does. For example, I am disgusted that he has made no attempt to secure our Southern border, and would grant amnesty to people who entered this nation illegaly. But will I vote for Bush as oppossed to Kerry? Yes.
I really don't give a damn about political ads one way or another. I can find and analyze the facts of the canidates' records. And I can make my own decesion.
But whatever way I may lean politically, I am flat-out pissed off that a major news outlet would use these obviously false documents in a story just to advance a particular agenda.
And that's not the only example I can give you of the media flsuhing ethics down the toilet.
How about CNN not reqiuring Carville and Begela to take a leave of absensce until after the election when they sign on to the Kerry campaign as advisors?
Let me will give you another example. Last Friday, I was in Huntington WV to see the President speak. After the event, I witnessed between 50 and 75 protesters doing their best to relive the 60s. On the drive home, the local AM radio news, which is aligned with ABC, reported that "thousands" of protesters took to the streets.
I am not niave. I know that asking the media to only give the facts without any point of view is unrealistic. But when it becomes
this obvious, I reserve the right to become angry about unprofessional partisans in an irresponsible attempt to sway the opinions of what they arrogantly consider to be a simple public.
